摘要
最后通谍博弈和独裁者博弈是实验经济学的经典博弈,也被心理学家用来研究人的公平和利他行为。该研究考查了经济学和心理学通常的报酬支付方式、博弈中待分配的金额是否影响博弈结果,以及两个博弈进行组内实验时是否会产生顺序效应。结果发现支付方式和金额不影响博弈结果,但有顺序效应产生。该研究对国内研究者进一步借用这两个博弈的相关研究打下了一定的方法学基础。
Ultimatum game and dictator game are classical games in experimental economics, also used by psychologists to study people＇s fair and altruism behavior. This study explored whether the different paying way of economics and psychology to participants, and the different stakes made difference to the game result, and whether there was an order effect when the two games served as a within-subject variable. Results showed that the paying way and the stake made no difference to the game result, but order effect existed. The study shed some light on further studies using these two games.
出处
《心理与行为研究》
2007年第4期305-308,共4页
Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金
中科院心理所创新经费
香港中文大学心理系的资助
关键词
决策
最后通谍博弈
独裁者博弈
方法效应
decision-making, ultimatum game, dictator game, method effect.
