期刊文献+

我国铁路系统生产效率的实证研究——基于DEA模型的两阶段分析 被引量:18

Efficiency Analysis of the Regional Railway in China:Based on the Application of DEA-tobit Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以数据包络分析法为理论工具,从生产效率的视角对我国铁路经营效率进行总体评价与定量分析,并在第二阶段通过Tobit模型对铁路生产无效率的影响因素予以识别。研究发现:(1)我国铁路总体上生产效率较低,纯技术无效率是主要根源;(2)东部是铁路最发达的地区,规模无效率和纯技术无效率分别是东部和中西部地区无效率的根源;(3)铁路普遍存在投入拥挤和产出不足的现象,中西部地区程度远高于东部地区;(4)经济发达程度、人口总数、铁路经营管理水平、铁路路网密度和公路路网密度是影响铁路生产无效率的主要因素。 This paper evaluates the railway efficiency of every province in China by the DEA approach, and analyzes the factors influencing the railway's inefficiency with Tobit regression model. It finds that:( 1 )the railway system in China is still at a relative low level of overall technical efficiency, and pure technical inefficiency is the main cause of the railway inefficiency in China ; (2) the railway development in China is not in balance, the East- ern region has the most developed railway system, scale inefficiency and pure technical inefficiency are the main source of railway inefficiency in Eastern region and Western regional respectively; (3) the railway input congestion and output insufficiency are existing in all the regions of China, but the phenomena in the Central and Western region is much serious than the Eastern region ; (4) the regional economic development, the regional population, the operational level of railway, the density of railway and highway are the important factors evidently affecting the railway inefficiency in China.
作者 李兰冰
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 2008年第4期58-63,共6页 Soft Science
基金 "985工程"区域经济国家哲学社会科学创新基地资助项目(1052122004700007)
关键词 铁路生产效率 综合技术效率 纯技术效率 规模效率 DEA模型 railway efficiency overall technical efficiency pure technical efficiency scale efficiency data envelopment analysis model (DEA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Caves D W, L R Christensen and J A Swanson. Productivity in US Railroads: 1951 - 1974[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, 11, 166 - 181,
  • 2Dodgson, J S. A Survey of Recent Developments in the Measurement of Rail Total Tactor Productivity[ A]. K J Button and D E Pitfield. International Railway Economics [ M]. Aldershot: Cower, 1985.
  • 3Nash, C. European Railway Comparisons - What can We Learn? [ M ]. K J Button, D E Piffield. International Railway Economics [ M ]. Aldershot: Cower Publishing, 1985.
  • 4Thompson, L S W G. Wood and F Lures, World Railway Performance Update[J]. Developing Railways, 1991:5 - 13.
  • 5Preston, J M . Assessing Public Sector Performance: The Case of Western European Railways[ A]. D Hensher, J King and T H Oum. Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Transport Research Volume4 : Transport Management [ C ]. 1996.56 - 343.
  • 6Bookbinder J H,W W Qu. Comparing the Performance of Major American Railroads [ J ]. Transportation Reasearch Forum, 1993, 33:70 - 85.
  • 7Tae Hoon Oum, Chunyan Yu. A Comparative Study of the OECD Countries's Railways[ J ]. Jouranl of Transport Economics and Policy, 1994, 3:121 -138.
  • 8Chames A, W W Cooper and E Rhodes. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2:429-44.
  • 9Banker R D, A Charnes and W W Cooper. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis [ J ]. Management Science, 1984,30,1078 - 92.
  • 10Tobin J. Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables[J]. Econometrica, 1985,26( 1 ) :24 -36.

同被引文献142

引证文献18

二级引证文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部