期刊文献+

生物样品分析方法的有效性验证 被引量:16

How to validate a bio-analytical method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于新建立的生物样品分析方法,首先必须进行方法有效性验证。生物样品分析方法有效性验证内容应包括选择性、线性、准确度、精密度、检测限、最低定量限、稳定性和提取回收率等。应用LC-MSn方法时还应验证基质效应。根据T2007国际法庭毒理年会上关于生物样品分析方法有效性验证讨论的主要内容,作者结合实际工作中的经验,阐述方法有效性验证的详细过程。可供建立生物样品分析方法时参考。 It is imperative that any newly established bio-analytical method is validated thoroughly, using standardised parameters. The purpose of this article is to provide recommendations on how to validate a new bio-analytical method. Based on author's personal experience and some interesting discussion points from the conference of "International Association of Forensic Toxicologists" in 2007, the authors propose these essential requirements for validating a new analytical method. The key parameters of method validation include selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, LOD (limit of detection), LLOQ (the lower limit of quantitation), stability and the extraction recovery. For any bio-analytical method using LC-MS^n (Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), studies of matrix effect should also be included in addition of the above parameters.
出处 《法医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2008年第1期60-65,共6页 Journal of Forensic Medicine
基金 国家科研院所社会公益研究专项(GY0601)
关键词 分析方法 有效性验证 生物样品 analytical methods method validation biosamples
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Hartmann C, Smeyers-Verbeke J, Massart DL. Validation of bioanalytical chromatographic methods [J]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 1998,17(2) : 193-218.
  • 2Lindner W, Wainer IW. Requirements for initial assay validation and publication in J Chromatogr B[J]. J Chromatogr B, 1998,707(1-2) : 1-2,
  • 3Shah VP, Midha KK, Findlay JW. Bioanalytical method validation-a revisit with a decade of progress[J]. Pharm Res,2000, 17(12) : 1551-1557.
  • 4Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R. Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC technical report) [J]. Pure Appl Chem, 2002,74 : 835-855.
  • 5Peters FT, Maurer HH. Bioanalytieal method validation and its implications for forensic and clinical toxicology-a review [J]. Accred Qual Assur,2002,7:441-449.
  • 6Taverniers I, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E. Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory Ⅱ. Analytical method validation and quality assurance,TrAC [J]. Trends Anal Chem,2004, 23:535-552.
  • 7Peters FT, Drummer OH, Musshoff F. Validation of new methods[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2007,165(2-3) :216-224.
  • 8Maurer HH, Advances in analytical toxicology: current role of liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry for drug quantification in blood and oral fluid (review) [J]. Anal Bioanal Chem,2005,381(1):110-118.
  • 9Guidance for bioanalytical method validation[EB/OL]. (2001-05) http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance.
  • 10Weinmann W, Goerner M, Vogt S. Fast confirmation of 11-nor-9-carboxy-(9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC- COOH) in urine by LC/MS/MS using negative atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization(APCI) [J]. Forensic Sci Int,2001,121(1-2): 103-107.

同被引文献131

引证文献16

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部