条件价值评估法介绍被引量：23

下载PDF

导出

摘要生态系统服务和环境物品的经济价值1评估是生态经济学领域的重要研究方向。条件价值评估法(Contingent Val-uation M ethod,CVM)是一种利用假想市场评估生态系统服务和环境物品价值的方法,是非市场价值评估技术中应用最广、影响最大的一种方法,广泛被应用于生态经济学和环境经济学。本文介绍了CVM的理论基础以及相关的研究进展,并讨论了CVM应用中几个具有争议的问题,指出了我国CVM研究存在的一些问题,希望这对于推动CVM在我国的发展和实践应用具有一定的借鉴作用。

作者唐增徐中民

机构地区中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所寒旱区流域水文及应用生态研究室

出处《开发研究》 CSSCI 2008年第1期74-77,共4页 Research On Development

基金国家自然科学重点基金项目资助(40235053)

关键词条件价值评估法支付意愿/受偿意愿可靠性/有效性

分类号 F124.5 [经济管理—世界经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1张志强,徐中民,程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(3):454-463. 被引量：247
2L. Venkatachalam. The contingent valuation method: a review [ J ]. Environment Impact Assessment Review, 2004,24:89 -124.
3Paulo A. L. D. Nuncs, Jcrom C. J. M. , van den Bergh, Economic valuation of biodivcrsity: sense or nonsense? [ J ]. Ecological Economics. 2001,39:203-222.
4Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al., Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin:Results from a contingent valuation survey [ J]. Ecological Economies, 2000,33 ( 1 ) : 103 - 107.
5Dan Greenberg et al. Willingness to pay for avoiding coronary restenesis and repeat revascularization: result from a contingent valuation study [J]. Health Policy, 2004, 70:207 -216.
6Thompson E, Berger M, Blomquist G, Allen S.. Valuing the arts: a contingent valuation approach [ J ]. Journal of Cultural Economics, 2002, 26: 87-113.
7Whittington. Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries[J]. World Development, 1998 ; 26:21 - 30
8薛达元.长白山自然保护区生物多样性非使用价值评估[J].中国环境科学,2000,20(2):141-145. 被引量：110
9徐中民,张志强,程国栋,苏志勇,鲁安新,林清,张海涛.额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估[J].地理学报,2002,57(1):107-116. 被引量：121
10Willig RD. Consumer's sulplus without apology [ J]. American Economic Review 1976 ; 66:589 - 97.

二级参考文献40

1中国科学院院士西北水资源考察团.关于黑河、石羊河流域合理用水和拯救生态问题的建议[J].中国科学院院刊,1996,11(1):7-9. 被引量：10
2H.范里安费方域（译）.微观经济学：现代观点[M].上海:三联书店，上海人民出版社,1995.746-749.
3[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179.
4[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612.
5[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29.
6[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
7[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148.
8[17]Lovett A, Bateman I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects [J]. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001, 25: 131-139.
9[18]Smith V K. Non-market valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal [J]. Land Economics, 1993, 69: 1-26.
10[19]Brown T C, Gregory R. Why the WTP-WTA disparity matters [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28: 323-335.