期刊文献+

不同检测系统测定血糖的方法学对比及偏差评估 被引量:3

Method Comparison and Bias Estimation for Blood Glucose with Different Analytic System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对不同检测系统进行方法学比对分析,探讨各系统之间检测血糖结果是否具有可比性。方法依据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)EP9-A文件要求,每天随机从临床样本中抽取8份不同浓度的血清样本,分别用两种检测系统进行血糖的测定,共测定5d,记录检测结果,对两种检测系统进行偏倚估计。结果相关系数r=0.998,截距a=0.081,斜率b=0.968,无方法间、内的离群点,测定结果的偏差在允许误差范围内。结论两种检测系统对血糖的测定能得到一致的检测结果。 Objective To explore the comparability of the different analytic systems for patient's serum glucose by method comparing between two analytic systems. Methods According to the document of NCCLS-EP9-A,every day,8 patient samples with different serum glucose concentration were analyzed respectively with two analytic systems for 5 days and recorded the test results in 5 days together. Then evaluated the bias estimation of the two analytic systems. Results The correlation coefficient of this experiment was 0.998,intercept (a) :0.081 ,slope(b):0.968,without outlier of within-method and between-method ,the bias of results were accepted in the range of the allowable error. Conclusion Concordant serum glucose results can be obtained using two analytic systems.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2008年第2期59-61,共3页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 EP9-A 方法比对 偏差评估 EPg-A method comparison bias estimation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1EP9A:Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples: Approved Guideline. NCCLS (1995).
  • 2NCCLS. Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples:NCCLS Document EP9-A2, ISBN 1-56238-472-4. Wayne ,PA:NCCLS,2002.
  • 3张传宝,张克坚.方法对比及偏差评估的方法─—介绍NCCLS文件EP9-A[J].江西医学检验,2000,18(2):108-109. 被引量:33
  • 4Richard W Jenny,Kathryn Y Jackson. Evaluation of the Rigor and Appropriateness of CLIA'88 Toxicology Proficiency Testing Standards [J]. Clin Chem, 1992,38~496-500.
  • 5James O Westyard,Robert W Burnett. Precision Requirements for Cost-Effective Operation of Analytical Processes[J]. Clin Chem, 1990,36 : 1629-1632.

共引文献32

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部