期刊文献+

低价揽客与压价竞争:对审计独立性的影响与管制对策 被引量:4

How Low-bailing and Price-cutting Affect Auditor Independence and How to Regulate Them
下载PDF
导出
摘要 低价揽客行为与压价竞争行为问题研究的焦点主要集中在其对审计独立性的影响上,但国外研究没有得出一致且明确的结论,国内研究则更显落后。低价揽客行为与压价竞争对审计独立性影响不确定的基源,在于对两种行为本身的界定的不清晰。低价揽客行为与压价竞争行为的发生,在审计市场竞争环境下具有必然性,并且它们具有共同的本质,即都是事务所让渡部分利益而取得业务的行为。基于此,我们认为,对于压价竞争行为,监管者应该加以管制,但必须划定监管责任,以免陷入监管误区。 Research on low-bailing and price competition is focused on how auditor independence. However, research abroad has not drawn a widely agreed they affect and clear conclusion, and research in China is still farther from doing this. The reason why it is not clear how low-bailing and price competition affect auditor independence is that they are not clearly defined. Low-bailing and price competition are inevitable in the competition environment in the auditing market and they share the same nature, namely, agencies give up some interest in return for business. On the basis of this we maintain that regulators should control price competition and define their responsibilities in order not to exercise regulation in areas beyond their jurisdiction.
作者 崔宏
出处 《广东金融学院学报》 CSSCI 2008年第2期44-56,共13页 Journal of Guangdong University of Finance
关键词 低价揽客行为 压价竞争 独立性 管制对策 Low-Bailing Price Competition Auditor Independence Control Measures
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1[1]Cohen and Commission,1978 (AICPA,1978):The Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities:Report,Conclusions,and Recommendations(Cohen Report),AICPA,New York,NY,1978.
  • 2[2]Magee,Robert P.,and Tseng,Mei-Chiun,1990:Audit Pricing And Independence,The Accounting Review,Apr 1990,65(2):315-336.
  • 3[3]DeAngelo,L.E.,1981:Auditor Independence,"Low BaUing",and Disclosure Regulation.Journal of Accounting and Economies.Vol.3(2):113-127.
  • 4[4]Schatzberg,Jeffrey W.,1990:A Laboratory Market Investigation Of Low Bailing Audit,The Accounting Review,1990 (April),65 (2):337-362.
  • 5[5]SEC,1978:Disclosure of ReLationships with Independent Public Accountants,Accounting Series Releuse,No.250,June 29,Washington D.C.:Government Printing Office.
  • 6[6]AICPA,1992:SEC Practice Section:Statement of Position Regarding Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms of Publicly Held Companies.New York:AICPA.
  • 7[7]Maher,M.,Tiesen,P.,Colson,R.,and Broman,A.J.,1992:Competition and audit fees.The Accounting Review.1992 (January),67(1):199 -211.
  • 8[8]Schatzberg,J.,1994:A New Examination of Auditor "Lowball" Pricing:Theoretical Model andExperimental Evidence.Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory.1994,13:33-55.
  • 9[9]Kanodia,C.,and Mukheriji,A.,1994:audit pricing,lowballing and autit turnover:a dynamic analysis,The Accounting Review,1994(October),69(4):593-615.
  • 10[10]Chi-Wen Jevons Lee and Zhaoyang Gu,1998:Low Bailing,Legal Liability and Auditor Independence.The Accounting Review,October 1998,73(4):533-555.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Chi- wen jevons lee&zhaoyang Gu. 1998. low baUing, legal liability and auditor independence, the accountng review vol.73no. 4 october pp: 533 -555.
  • 2Dye. 1993. auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth, journal of political economiy (10) : 887 -914.
  • 3Deangelo. 1981. auditor indepengdence, lowbaUing and disclosure regulation, journal of accounting and economic, 3.
  • 4Eichenseher and shields. 1983. the correlates of CPA -firm change for publicly -held corporations, auditing: a journal practice and theory (spring) : 23 ~ 37.
  • 5Jensen and mecking. 1976. theorypf the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownershipstructure, journal of financial economics, 3.
  • 6Simunic&stein. 1996. the impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: a review of the economics and the evidence, journal of practice and theory (15) : 119 ~ 134.
  • 7Simmunic. 1980. the pricing of audit services: theory and evidence, journal of accounting research, 18:161 - 190.
  • 8Simunic and Stein. 1987. product differentiation in auditing: auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issure, research monograph number 13. Vancouver: the Canadian certifiedgeneral accountants'research foundation.
  • 9Simon&Francis. 1988. the effects of auditor change on the audit fees : tests of price cutting and price recovery, the accounting review, vol. 63, no. 2, april, pp: 255 -269.
  • 10Srinivasan&Scott. 2003. journal of accounting research. Sep 2003. Vol. 41, Iss. 4 : p. 721.

共引文献28

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部