期刊文献+

IFN-γ、ADA在胸腔积液鉴别诊断的临床评价

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究胸腔积液中干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)的表达水平及其检测对鉴别良、恶性胸腔积液的临床意义。方法采用双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附实验(ELISA)法和酚钠试剂显色法分别检测49例胸腔积液(18例结核性胸腔积液、20例恶性胸腔积液、8例类肺炎性胸腔积液、3例漏出液)中的IFN-γ、ADA水平。结果结核性胸腔积液组中的IFN-γ表达水平〔(710±64.8)pg/ml〕最高,与恶性胸腔积液组〔(47.1±21.6)pg/ml〕相比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),且IFN-γ的检测对结核性胸腔积液的诊断具有较高的灵敏度和特异度,分别为94.4%和96.8%,两者均高于结核性胸腔积液中ADA的检测单独检测IFN-γ与IFN-γ、ADA联合检测相比较,其诊断评价差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论检测胸腔积液中IFN-γ的水平有助于良、恶性胸腔积液的鉴别,对结核性胸腔积液的诊断具有较高的临床价值。
出处 《中国实用医药》 2008年第11期30-31,共2页 China Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1陈娟.良恶性胸水鉴别诊断的若干进展[J].医学综述,2003,9(2):86-88. 被引量:9
  • 2[3]Gen Yamada,Noriharu Shijubo,Katsunori Shigehara,et al Increased levels of circulating interhukin-18 in patients with advanced tuberculosis.American Jonmal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,2000,161(6):1787.
  • 3[4]Huang M,Sharma S,Mao JT.Non-small cell lung cancer-derrved soluble mediators and prostaglsnd in E2 enhance peripheral blood lymphocyte IL-10 transcription and protein praduction J lmmunol,1996,157:12:5512.
  • 4[5]Chen YM,Yang WK,Whany PJ,et al.Restoration of the immtmocompotence by IL-2 activation and TCR-CD3 engagement of the invivoanergized tumor-specific CTL from lung cancer patients.J Immuno Ther,1997,20(5):354.
  • 5[6]Piras MA,Gakkia C,Budreni M,et al.Adenosine deaminase activity in plural effusions:an aid to differential diagnosis.Br Med J,1978,2(6154):1751-1752.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Villena V, Navarro-Gonzalvez TA, Garcia-Benayas C, et al. Rapid automated determination of adenosine deaminase and lysozyme for differentiating tuberculous and nontuberculouspleural effusion [ J ]. Clin Chem,1996,42(2) :218-221.
  • 2Gakis C, Calia GM, Naitana AG, et al. Serum and pleural adenosine deaminase activity, correct interpretation of the findings [ J ]. Chest,1991,99(6): 1555-1557.
  • 3Lee YC, Knox BS, Garrett JE. Use of cytokeratin fragment 19.1 and 19.21 ( Cyfra 21-1 ) in the differentiatiant of malignant and benign pleural effusions[ J] . Aust NZ J Med, 1999,29(6) :765-769.
  • 4Shimokata K, Saka H, Murate T, et al. Cytokine content in pleural effusion comparisonbetween tuberculous and carcinomatous pleurisy [ J ].Chest, 1991,99 (5): 1103.
  • 5Porcel JM, Gazquez I, Vives M, et al. Diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis by the measurement of soluble interleukin receptor in pleural fluid[ J].Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2000,4(10):975-979.
  • 6Elisabetta P, Mark GJ, Mario M, et al. Interleukin-8 induces lymphocyte chemotaxis into the pleural space[J] .Am J Respir. Crit Care Med,1999,159(5): 1592-1599.
  • 7Motherby H,Nadjari B,Remmerbach T, et al.Static DNA cytometry as a dignosic acid in effusion cytology :DNA aneuploidy for identification of neoplastic cells in equivocal [ J ]. Anal Quant Cytol Hi stol, 1998,20(3): 162-168.
  • 8Ming SH,Mec ST,Jhi-Jhu H, et al. Comparison of nucleolar organiser regions and DNA flow cytometry in the evaluation of pleural effusion[ J ]. Thorax, 1994,49 ( 11 ): 1152.
  • 9Rodriguez F, Teresa M, Orlando A, et al. Value of DNA analysis in addition to cytological testing in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions [ J ]. Thorax, 1994,49 (7): 692-694.
  • 10Cheng TY, Lee MH, Lan RS, et al. Telomerase activity in pleural effusion: diagnostic significance [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 1998,16 (5): 567-573.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部