期刊文献+

学习过程问卷的结构及信、效度研究 被引量:15

A Research on the Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Study Process Questionnaire(SPQ)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨学习过程问卷的结构并检验其信、效度。方法:以Biggs等人的研究为基础,使用雷雳等1997年研究中的学习过程问卷,对756名大学生的测试结果进行探索性和验证性因子分析及信效度检验。结果:探索性及验证性因素分析均支持六因子模型,不支持根据理论建构的其它三个模型;问卷整体内部一致性系数为0.81,间隔六月问卷的稳定性系数为0.70;各因素间的相关在-0.01-0.50之间,各因素与总分间的相关在0.41以上,问卷各题项与其所属因素间相关在0.42以上。结论:本研究支持该问卷的六因素结构,问卷的信效度符合心理测量学的基本要求,但表层动机及表层策略所属个别题项仍需进一步的修改。 Objective: To explore the structure of the SPQ and to examine its reliability and validity. Methods: On the basis of researches of Biggs et.al, using the SPQ borrowed from professor LeiLi et.al. 's study in 1997, we administrated the SPQ to 756 college students. EFA and CFA were used to verify the structure of the SPQ and its reliability and validity were also tested. Results: The results supported the six factors model, and did not support the other three models established according to different theories. The Cronbach's α of the questionnaire was 0.81 and the coefficient of stability of the questionnaire was 0.70 at six months ,interval; The correlations between 6 factors were -0.01-0.50, and all factor-total correlations were over 0.41. The correlations between each of the 6 factors and all items belonging to the corresponding factor were over 0.42. Conclusion: Supporting the six factors model of the SPQ; reliability and validity of the questionnaire meet the standard of psychometrics, but some items belonging to the factors of surface motivation and surface strategy still need to be modified in future.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2008年第2期119-122,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 大学生 学习过程问卷 结构 信度 效度 College student The study process questionnaire Structure Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Biggs J. Individual and groups differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978,48: 266-279
  • 2Biggs J. Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1987a
  • 3Biggs J.Study process questionnaire manual. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1987b
  • 4Watkins D, Astilla E. Some evidence on the reliability and validity of the Biggs Study Process Questionnaire with Filipino children. Australian Journal of Education, 1982, 26(1): 104-106
  • 5Albaili, Mohamed A. An Arabic version of the Study Process Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity. Psychological Reports, 1995, 77(3): 1083
  • 6Liem AD, Prasetya PH. Preliminary Evidence for Validity of the Indonesian Version of Study Process Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 2007, 100(1): 333-338
  • 7Huy PP, Bisun D. Approaches to Learning in Educational Psychology and Mathematics: A Comparative Analysis in the South Pacific Region. Australian Association for Research in Education, 2006. 1-33
  • 8Albert Yung-kwan Chan, David W. How Do Hong Kong Hospital-Based Student Nurses Learn? Educational Research Journal, 1995, 10(1): 54-59
  • 9雷雳,侯志瑾,白学军.不同年级高师学生的学习动机与学习策略[J].心理发展与教育,1997,13(4):18-22. 被引量:55
  • 10张亚玲,郭德俊.学习策略教学对学习动机的影响研究[J].心理科学,2001,24(3):352-353. 被引量:54

二级参考文献1

共引文献103

同被引文献148

引证文献15

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部