期刊文献+

家庭暴力施暴者的社会心理多因素Logestic回归分析 被引量:5

Logistic Regression Analysis of the Psychosociology of Physical Domestic Violence on Male Perpetrators
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨家庭男性躯体施暴者的社会心理学因素,为进一步干预家庭暴力提供帮助。方法:采用病例对照研究,对156例社区家庭男性躯体施暴者和44例正常对照组用社会人口学指标、社会支持量表、父母养育方式量表、儿童期虐待问卷、艾森克人格问卷、反社会人格症状问卷、症状自评量表、应付方式问卷、家庭功能问卷进行评定,对多种因素进行Logestic回归分析。结果:Logestic回归分析依次进入方程的是婚后夫妻关系,父亲惩罚、严厉的养育方式,嗜烟、反社会人格障碍症状、外向型人格、主观的社会支持、情感介入和退避的应付方式。结论:父亲惩罚、严厉的养育方式,嗜烟,外向性格,社会支持和情感介入6个变量是家庭躯体暴力男性施暴者最显著的预测指标。 Objective: To investigated the psychosocial factors of the physical domestic violence of male perpetraters and provide help to interfere in family violence further. Methods: 156 male samples who had domestic violent behavior were tested by the demographic data, Social Support Questonnaire (SSQ), Egm Minnen av Bardnosnaupp-forstran (EMBU), CTQ-SF, EPQ, Antisocial Personality Disorder Symptoms (APDS), Coping Style Questionnair (CSQ), Self-Esteen Scale (SES), SCL-90, and Fmamily Asessment Device (FAD). The obtained data were compared with those of 44 normal controls derived from the community sample. The factors of the male physical domestic violence were examined by Binary Logestic Regression. Results: Binary Logestic Regression on the violent behavior of the physical domestic violence by male perpetraters: Variables entered on step: (1)the marital relationship; (2)punishment and severity of fathers in EMBU; (3)smoking; (4)antisocial pemonality disorder symptoms;(5)EPQ-E; (6)subjective social support; (7)affective involvement in family functioning; (8)retreat in coping style. Conclusion: Punishment and severity of fathers in EMBU, smoking, EPQ-E, subjective social support and affective involvement in family functioning are the statistically signs for the physical domestic violence of men.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2008年第2期210-212,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 美国纽约中华医学基金会资助(01-749)
关键词 家庭暴力 男性施暴者 社会心理因素 Logestic回归 Physical domestic violence Male perpetrators Psychosocial factors Logestie regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1黄先碧.对家庭暴力的思考[J].社会科学,1997(10):52-55. 被引量:4
  • 2杨世昌,张亚林,黄国平,郭果毅.儿童受虐方式调查分析(英文)[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(15):2994-2995. 被引量:1
  • 3赵幸福,张亚林,李龙飞.435名儿童的儿童期虐待问卷调查[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(4):377-379. 被引量:95
  • 4胡佩诚.200对夫妇家庭暴力调查[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4):171-171. 被引量:24
  • 5Straus MA. Behind Closed Doors:Violence in the American Family. New York. NY: Anchor,1980. 13-57.
  • 6American Medical Association. Diagnostic and treatment guideline on domestic violence. Arch Fam Med, 1992, 1: 39-47.
  • 7WHO. World report on violence and health. World Health Organization,2002. 6-78.
  • 8Fartuzzo J, Boruch R, Beriama A, et al. Domestic violence and children.Prevalence and risk in five major U.S. Cities. J Am Acad. Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 1997,36(1): 116-112.
  • 9Dube SR. Childhood abuse, household dysfunction, and the risk of attempted suicide throughout the lifespan. JAMA, 2001 286:3089-3096.
  • 10Chaulk R, King PA. Violence in families: assessing prevention and treatment programs. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1998.

共引文献96

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部