期刊文献+

欧共体反倾销制度的突出特点 被引量:2

The European Community's Anti-dumping System: Salient Features
下载PDF
导出
摘要 译文首先从制度控制层面的角度介绍欧共体反倾销制度,认为欧同体反倾销措施受到了反倾销委员会、欧洲初审法院和欧洲法院以及WTO争端解决机制三个层面有效控制;其次专门介绍了公共利益评估和从低征税这两个"超WTO"规则;最后介绍了欧同体对非市场经济和转型经济的实践。欧共体反倾销制度有效地平衡当事方利益,是较为成功的制度。 The author firstly elaborates EC anti-dumping system from the perspective of control levels. That is to say, the EC anti-dumping measures are effectively controlled respectively by anti-dumping committee of the commission; court of first instance and court of justice and WTO dispute settlement system. Subsequently, two WTO-plus rules including Public Interest Test and Lesser Duty Rules are introduced. Lastly, it is about EC approach towards non-market economies and economies in transition. The conclusion is that EC anti-dumping system is in fact a balancing of the economic interests of the different operators, and is a successful system.
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期80-84,共5页 International Economics and Trade Research
关键词 欧共体 反倾销 突出特点 EC anti-dumping salient features
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 no protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p.1, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No461/2004, OJ L77,8.3.2004, p.12.
  • 2This is confirmed by the judgment of the Court of justice in C-76/ 01, Burocoton and others v. Council [2003] ECR 1-10091).
  • 3see, e.g., cases C-358/89, Extramet lndustrie SAv. Council [1992] ECR-I, 3813, and T-58/99, Mukand and others v. Council [2001] ECR-II, 2521.
  • 4The procedural rights of the parties are a recurring feature in many court cases since C-49/88, AI-Jnbail Fertilizer Company and others v. Council [1991] ECR-I, 3187.
  • 5case C-69/89, Nakajima All Precision Co Ltd. v. Council[1991] ECR-I, 2069.
  • 6The two cases are DS 141, European Communities-Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-type Bed linen from India, and DS 219, European Communities-Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Malleable Cast Iron Tube or Pipe Fitting from Brazil.
  • 7WTO《反倾销协议》.第11条第4款.
  • 8A "case" is counted according to WTO standards: a duty imposed on imports of product A from countries B and C counts as two cases.
  • 9Horlick and Vermulst. 2005. The 10 Major Problems With the AntiDumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis[J]. Journal of World Trade(February 2005): 67-73.
  • 10Vermulst.2005. The 10 Major Problems With the Anti-Dumping Instrument in the European Community[J]. Journal of World Trade (February 2005): 105-113.

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部