期刊文献+

违宪审查的逻辑结构 被引量:1

The Logical Structure of Constitutional Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 违宪审查是特定国家机关依据宪法对抽象规范和具体行为进行的合宪性审查,由审查主体、依据和对象三要素构成。违宪审查主体的确立应遵从民主和权力制约原则,确保法官的独立性并建立修宪权与违宪审查权相互制约的机制。违宪审查的依据是宪法典而非部门宪法。违宪审查对象的确定应依据权力渊源和规范内容渊源二重标准。 Constitutional review includes the three dements of subject, criterion and object. The assignment of constitutional review should accord with the principles of democracy and power restriction, separate and balance the power of constitution amendment and constitutional review. The criterion of constitutional review should be constitutionally coded instead of being departmental. The objects of constitutional review should be defined according to related descriptions in the origins of legislation power and specifications.
作者 叶海波
机构地区 深圳大学法学院
出处 《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第1期35-40,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
关键词 违宪审查 主体 对象 依据 修宪权 constitutional review subject object criterion power of constitution amendment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]甘阳.关于研究美国的一封信[EB/OL].http://www.fsou.com/html/text/art/33557531/335575388-3.html.[2007-05-16].
  • 2[2]林来梵.司法上的创举和谬误:也评"马伯里诉麦迪逊案"[EB/OL].http://www.xianfa.net/act/index.asp.[2007-08-19].
  • 3汉密尔顿.联邦党人文集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980..
  • 4何海波.没有宪法的违宪审查——英国故事[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):109-122. 被引量:28
  • 5[6]ALISONL.YOUNG.Judicial sovereignty and the human rights act 1998[J].Cambridge Law Journal,2002(61):53-65.
  • 6[7]让·布隆代尔,毛里齐奥·科塔.政党政府的性质:一种比较性的欧洲视角[M].曾淼,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:16.
  • 7黄舒芃.法律保留原则在德国法秩序下的意涵与特征[J].中原财经法学,2004,(13):2-45.

二级参考文献105

  • 1International Transport Roth Gmbh v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] 3 WLR 344.
  • 2M. Elliot, Parliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order (2002) Legal Study 340.
  • 3Lord Irvine, The Impact of the Human Rights Act: Parliament, the Courts and the Executive (2003) PublicLaw 308.
  • 4K. D. Ewing, The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy (1999) Modern Law Review 79.
  • 5Alison L. Young, Judicial Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act 1998 (2002) Cambridge Law Journal 53.
  • 6Jeffery Goldsworthy, The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Clarendon Press, 1999).
  • 7Report of the Select Committee on a Bill of Rights (HL 176, 1978).
  • 8Richard T. E. Latham, The Law and the Commonwealth (Oxford University Press, 1949), especially p.523.
  • 9H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press, 1961), pp. 97-111.
  • 10William Wade, Sovereignty: Revolution or Evolution? (1996) Law Quarterly Review 568, at 574.

共引文献69

同被引文献9

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部