我国工业CO_2排放影响因素差异性研究——基于高耗能行业与中低耗能行业被引量：16

Research on the Differences of CO_2 Emission from Industries in China——Based on Energy-Intensive and Non-Energy-Intensive Industries

下载PDF

导出

摘要采用改进的指数分解法LMDI对我国1994—2003年工业高耗能行业与中低耗能行业CO2排放影响因素的差异性进行比较研究,结论表明:工业经济增长效应和子行业结构效应对两类行业CO2排放分别起到加剧和减缓的作用;高耗能能源强度效应经历了从加剧CO2排放到抑制CO2排放的转变,而中低耗能行业相应值在整个样本期都起到减排的作用;子行业能源消耗结构效应对高耗能行业起较小的减排作用,对中低耗能行业起加剧的作用且有不断扩大的趋势;CO2排放系数效应对两者影响都较小。 The influencing elements of different consuming energy industries of CO2 emission are dif- ferent, we compare, by implying the improved index decomposition method LMDI, the differences of influencing factors of CO2 emission between energy - intensive and non energy-intensive industries from 1994 to 2003. Our findings are as follows. Firstly, the economic and structural effects separately increase and alleviate CO2 emission. Secondly, the energy intensity effect experiences a transition from increasing CO2 emission to restraining CO2 emission, while it shows the CO2 emission declining trend from non energy-intensive industries during the whole sampling times. Thirdly, the alleviating function of structural effect on CO2 emission is relatively low in non energy-intensive industries but is quite high and maintains a trend of consistent enlargement in non energy-intensive industries. Fourthly, the impact of coefficient effect of CO2 emission is not obvious on both energy intensive and non energy intensive industries.

作者查冬兰周德群

机构地区南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院

出处《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期13-19,共7页 Finance and Trade Research

基金国家自然科学基金"衰退矿区优势要素向西部能源富集地转移研究"(批准号90510010)

关键词高耗能行业中低耗能行业 CO2 排放指数分解 energy-intensive industries non energy-intensive industries CO2 emission index decomposition

分类号 F205 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1国家发展和改革委员会网站(http://www.sdpc.gov.on/mtbd/t20060721j7094.htm).
2ANG B W. 2004. Decompoeition analysis for policy making in cnergy: which is the preferrod method [J]. Energy Policy, (32) :1131 - 1139.
3ANG B W, LIU F L. 2000. A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and conaistent in aggregation [J]. Energy, 26 (6) : 537 -548.
4ANG B W, PANDrYAN G. 1997. Decomposition of energy-induced CO2 emissions in manufacturing [J]. Energy Economics, 19 (3) : 363-374
5ANG B W, ZHANG F Q, CHOI KI -HONG. 1998. Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators throush decomposition [J]. Energy, 23(6) :489-495.
6BOYD G, et al. 1987. Separating the changing composition of US manufacturing production from energy efficiency improvements: a Divisia Index approach [J]. Energy Journal, 8 (2) :77 -96.
7BOYD G A, HANSON D A, STERNER T. 1988. Decomposition of changes in energy intcnsity:a comparison of the Divisia Index and other Methods [J]. Energy Economics, 10 (4) : 309 -312.
8HOWARTH R B,et al. 1991. Manufacturing energy use in eight OECD countries[J]. Energy Economics, 13(2) : 135 -42.
9HULTEN C R. 1973. Divisia Index numbers [J]. Econometrica, 41(6) : 1017 -1025.
10LIU N A,ANG B W. 2007. Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: energy intensity versus product mix[J]. Energy Economies, in press.