期刊文献+

非业绩指标存在性的理论分析和实证检验

Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Test of the Existence of Non-performance Indexes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从Holmstrom的标准委托—代理模型出发,可以得出高管人员报酬仅仅是业绩的函数,非业绩指标在契约中的存在只会增加代理成本;而从经理主义的经理人自利角度出发,可以对非业绩指标存在性给予充分解释。但在现实中,几乎所有国家上市公司的高管报酬契约中都存在非业绩指标,很难用这些公司股东都没有发现或者没有能力遏制经理的自利行为来进行解释。从理论和实证的角度,对非业绩指标在契约中的存在性进行探讨,阐述规模指标的存在,同样也是符合代理理论和股东利益的。 There is no evidence of the existence of non-performance indexes in the reward contract from the Holmstrom' standard Principal-Agent model. But the existence of the non-performance index, especially the size index in the reward contract, can obviously be explained by managerialism. In fact, American, English, Canadian, Japanese and China's positive researches have discovered that the size index exists in the reward contract. This phenomenon can hardly be explained by the undiscoveredness and disability of company shareholders to control manager~ self-interest behavior.
作者 陈震
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期106-109,共4页 Finance and Trade Research
关键词 非业绩指标 存在性 经理主义 代理理论 non-performance indexes existing managerialism agent theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1谌新民,刘善敏.上市公司经营者报酬结构性差异的实证研究[J].经济研究,2003,38(8):55-63. 被引量:366
  • 2魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2000,35(3):32-39. 被引量:1644
  • 3BAKER G P,HALL B J. 1998. CEO incentives and finn size[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 6868.
  • 4BAKER G P,JENSEN M C, MURPHY, KEVIN J. 1988. Compensation and incentives : practice vs. theory[ J]. The Journal of Finance,43 : 593 -616.
  • 5BAUMOL W. 1959. Business behavior,value and growth[ M]. New York : Macmillan Publishing Company: 10 -25.
  • 6CONYON M. 1997. Corporate governance and executive compensation [ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15 : 493 - 510.
  • 7COSH, HUGHES. 1997. Executive remuneration, executive dismissal and institutional shareholdings[ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15:469 - 492.
  • 8CUZICK J. 1985. A Wilcoxen - type test for trend [ J ]. Statistics in Medlcine,4:87 - 90.
  • 9GOMEZ - MEJIA L, TOSI, HINKIN. 1987. Managerial control, performance and executive compensation [ J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 30:51 -70.
  • 10HOMLSTROM B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability[ J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 10:74 -91.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Jensen, M and Murphy, K , 1990,Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives , Journal of Political Economy.
  • 2Hall, B and liebman , J , 1998, Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats? Quartertly Journal of Economics , Augst.
  • 3Oswald S L , J S Jahera. Jr, 1991, The Influence of Ownership on Performance : An Empirical Study , Strategy Management Journal,Vol. 12:322.
  • 4Adams, M. and Hossain M.. Managerial Discretion and Voluntary Disclosure Empirical Evidence from the New Zealand Life Insurance Industry[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1998,17 : 245-281.
  • 5Aghion, Philippe and Tirole, Jean. Formal and Real Authority in Organizations[J]. The Journal of Political, 1997, (2) : 1-29.
  • 6Burkart, Mike and Gromb, Denis. Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997,112(3) :693-728.
  • 7Capenter, M. A. and Golden, B. R.. Perceived Managerial Discretion: a Study of Cause and Effect[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18(3) : 187- 206.
  • 8Finkelstein, S. and Bord, B.. How Much Does CEO Matter? The Role of Managerial Discretion in the Setting of CEO Compensation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998,40(2): 179-199.
  • 9Malekzadeh, A. R., McWillams, V. B. and Sen, Nilanjan. Implications of CEO Structural and Ownership Powers:Board Ownership and Composition on the Market's Reaction to Anti-takeover Charter Amendments[J]. Journal of Applied Business Research, 1998,1 (8) : 83-62.
  • 10Zhang, Weiying. Decision Rights, Residual Claim and Performance: a Theory of How the Chinese State Enterprise Reform Works[J]. China Economic Review, 1997,7 (1) : 68-82.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部