期刊文献+

网络课程评价指标体系的比较分析 被引量:8

The comparative analysis of the standards about web-based course evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 网络课程的质量是网络教育质量的第一生命线,网络课程质量的评价既要符合网络教育现阶段的发展规律,又要体现网络教学的理念、特征和方法。本文阐述了我国2007年网络精品课程评审指标体系内容,并从评价体系的开发、指标结构和指标使用等方面与美国密歇根虚拟大学(MVU)优质在线课程标准评价体系进行对比分析。 The quality of web-based course depends on that of distance education. Meanwhile, the evaluations . on web- based course should be accordance with the development of distance education nowadays; also it should reflect the goal, characteristics and methods of distance education. The paper relates the content of standards and assessment system of high- quality online courses, and compares with that of online courses in MVU from the meaning, the structure and the use.
作者 李新 陈庚
出处 《河北工程大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第1期82-84,101,共4页 Journal of Hebei University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
关键词 网络课程 评价指标 比较 Web- based courses assessment standards comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1赵立影.从活动理论看以学生为中心的学习环境设计[J].现代教育技术,2004,14(4):19-21. 被引量:39
  • 2.现代远程教育工程教育资源开发标准(征求意见稿)[S].,..
  • 3朱凌云.网络课程评价[DB/OL].http://202.112.88.32,.
  • 4徐皓.试论教学设计之评价在网络课程中的维度与要义[DB/OL].http://202.112.88.32.,.
  • 5Arbaugh, J.B. (2000). How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet based MBA courses. Business Communication Quarterly, Vol.63, No.4, 9- 26.
  • 6Ehrlich, D. (2002). Establishing connections: interactivity factors for a distance education. Educational Technology & Society, Vol.5, No.2, 48- 54.
  • 7Hawkes, M. & Dennis, T. (2003). Supporting and assessing online interaction in higher education,Educational Technology,July August,52 -56.
  • 8Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Lahav, O. & Oren, A. (2000). Web based learning environment: current pedagogical and technological state, Journal of Research and Computing in Education, Vol.33, No.1.
  • 9Offier, B. & Lev, J. (2000). Constructing and aid for evaluating teacher learner interaction in distance learning,Education Media International,Vol.37,No.2,91- 97.
  • 10Roblye, M.D. & Ekhaml, L. (2000). How interactive are your distance courses? A Rubric for Assessing Interaction in Distance Learning, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, vol.3, No.2.

共引文献85

同被引文献38

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部