期刊文献+

二级医院对急性心肌梗死急诊溶栓的可行性探讨

The Practice of Thrombolysis Administering in Emergency Department of Community Hospital for AMI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析影响急性心肌梗死(AMI)溶栓治疗的相关因素,观察急诊溶栓治疗的诊断―用药时间的改善情况及溶栓疗效。方法:分别从发病时间(溶栓时间窗)、年龄和疾病严重程度等因素探讨对溶栓治疗的影响,结合诊断―用药时间分析我院溶栓治疗的再通率情况。结果:影响溶栓治疗的最主要因素依次为时间窗、年龄、心功能(KillipⅢ级)、non-STE、心源性休克等;急诊科诊断―用药时间为101.9min;溶栓再通率为83.3%。结论:急诊科开始溶栓所需要的时间明显缩短,再通率也明显增加,影响溶栓最主要的因素为发病时间窗、年龄及疾病严重程度等,提示在二级医院急诊溶栓治疗可能是首选措施。 Objective:To analyze the most important factors of influencing thrombelitic therapy for AMI, at same time we observed the effectiveness of improving the 'Time of diagnose to thrombolysis beginning time' by performing emergency thrombolysis. Method:We studied the factors including the time after occurrence of AMI, age, severity of disease with AMI, non-STE and others respectively on the influence of thrombolysis, assessing the ' Time of diagnose to thrombolysis beginning time' and reperfusion rate. Results:The factors on deciding administering thrombolysis for AMI were occurrence time.age.heart failure (Killip Ⅲ级).non-STE.cardiogenic shock. The time of diagnose to thrombelysis was 101.9 min averagely, the reperfusion rate was 83.3%. Conclusion:The time of diagnose to thrombolysis administering was obviously shorter than before, the reperfusion rate was also increasing, the most important factors influencing thrombolysis was occurrence time, age and severity of disease with AMI. It means that thrombolysis in emergency department is likely to be the primary option for AMI in community hospital.
出处 《岭南急诊医学杂志》 2008年第1期5-6,共2页 Lingnan Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 广东省医学科研基金立项课题(A2005310)
关键词 急性心肌梗死 溶栓治疗 再通率 急诊科 acute myocardial infarction thrombolysis reperfusion rate emergency department
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1陈锋,戴木森,陈宏毅,张宇彪.急诊绿色通道静脉溶栓救治急性心肌梗死的可行性研究[J].中国急救医学,2005,25(3):172-174. 被引量:8
  • 2刘纪改,姚玉才,徐瑞,徐文伟,张伟,况荣光,高梅.早期溶栓治疗终止急性心肌梗死的探讨[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(9):782-784. 被引量:27
  • 3急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1321
  • 4中华心血管病杂志编委会.急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案[J].中华心血管病杂志,1991,19:137-137.
  • 5[1]Weaver WD, Simes RJ,Betriu A,et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: aquantitative review[J].JAMA,1997,278:2093-2098.
  • 6[2]Caspi A, Gottlieb S, Behar S, et al. Delayed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction[J].Int J Cardiol 1998,63:199-204.
  • 7[3]Pizzetti G,Belitti G,Margonate A, et al. Coronary recanalization by elective angioplasty prevents ventricular dilation after anterior myocardial infarction[J].J Am Coll Cardial,1996,28:837.
  • 8[4]Hsieh IC, Chang MS, et al. Late coronary artery stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].Am Heart J,1998,136:606-602.
  • 9Karagounis L, Ipsen SK, Jessop MR, et al . Impact of field - transmitted electrocardiography on time to in - hospital thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1990,66(10) :786 - 791.
  • 10Lambrew CT, Bowlby LJ, Rogers WJ, et al. Factors influencing the time to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction[J]. Time to Thrombolysis Substudy of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction - 1. Arch Intern Med, 1997,157:2577 - 2582.

共引文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部