摘要
我国《合同法》第30条、第31条与《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》等其它立法中的有关规定存在细微差异。学界在承诺对要约的实质性变更问题上存在五个认识方面的误区。我们应抛弃概念演绎型的思维进路,代之以标准界分型的思维进路,确立划分实质性变更与非实质性变更的合理标准。比较四种学说,"合理人标准"说及"出乎要约人意料"说较为可取。
There are some nuances between articles 30 and 31 in Contract Law of China and regulations in other laws such as CISG, and inaccurate views exist in five aspects of understanding acceptance which materially alters the offer. This paper puts that we should substitute the concept - deducing way of thinking with the distinguishing - each - other - according - to - a - standard way of thinking, and establish a reasonable standard to distinguish between material alteration and non - material alteration. Comparing the four theories, the theory of ＂rational man standard＂ and the theory of ＂offeror＇ s unexpectation＂ are rather acceptable.
出处
《四川文理学院学报》
2008年第3期42-45,共4页
Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal
关键词
合同法
要约
承诺
实质性变更
Contact Law
offer
acceptance
material alteration
