期刊文献+

异质产品Bertrand寡头竞争企业分散授权横向兼并效应分析 被引量:3

Horizontal Mergers of Firms with Decentralized Delegation in Differentiated Bertrand Oligopoly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对异质产品寡头Bertrand竞争市场,建立了一个替代性产品企业分散授权横向兼并Bertrand竞争博弈模型,分析了企业采用分散授权横向兼并模式时的效应问题。证明企业具有较大的采用分散委托授权模式兼并动力,且产品替代性程度越高,兼并动力越大;但企业分散委托授权兼并模式兼并动力比集中委托授权兼并模式稍弱一些。讨论了企业采用分散授权兼并模式时,兼并后各企业的内部激励机制调整问题,证明兼并企业采用的激励机制与未兼并企业所采用的激励机制有明显差异,兼并企业所采用的激励机制其攻击性显著减弱,而未兼并企业所采用的激励机制其攻击性仅略有减弱。 In this paper,we establish a game model of horizontal mergers under Bertrand competition in an oligopoly industry with substitute products, and analyze horizontal merger effects of firms when merger firms adopt decentralized delegation. We show that the firms have stronger incentive for merger under decentralized delegation, the incentive for merger will become stronger when the degree of product substitution is higher, and yet the incentive for merger under decentralized delegation is lower than that under centralized delegation. Furthermore, we discuss the adjustment of incentive mechanism of these firms after merger under decentralized delegation. We show that the incentive mechanisms have substantially differ- ence between merger firms and non-merger firms after merger process. More precisely ,after the merger process, the merger firm provides a much less aggressively incentive mechanism to its managers, but other non-merger firms give a slight less aggressively incentive mechanism to its managers.
出处 《系统工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期41-46,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70171025) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(02JJY5017)
关键词 横向兼并 分散授权 BERTRAND竞争 激励机制 Horizontal Merger Decentralized Delegation Bertrand Competition Incentive Mechanisms
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Stigler G J. Monopoly and oligopoly by merger[J]. The American Economic Review, 1950,40 (5): 23-34.
  • 2Salant S W, et al. Losses from horizontal mergers: the effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on Cournot-Nash equilibrium [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983,98: 185-199.
  • 3Deneckere R,et al. Incentives to form coalitions with Bertrand competition [J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1986,16 : 473-486.
  • 4夏同水,徐伟宣.兼并效应与产品覆盖策略[J].管理科学学报,2002,5(3):50-55. 被引量:14
  • 5Daughety A F. Beneficial concentration[J]. American Economic Review, 1990,80 : 1231-1237.
  • 6庄亚明,李金生,钟德强,吴广谋.基于决策优势的企业横向兼并行为分析[J].系统工程,2005,23(6):63-66. 被引量:3
  • 7Fershman C. Internal organizations and managerial incentive as strategic variables in a competitive environment [J]. International of Industrial Organization, 1985,3: 245-253.
  • 8Vickers J. Delegation and the theory of the firm[J]. Economic Journal, 1985,95 (Conference Papers): 138 -147.
  • 9Fershman C, et al. Equilibrium incentive in oligopoly[J]. American Economic Review, 1987,77 : 927-940
  • 10唐要家,唐春晖.市场里的企业:策略性效应与企业所有权和经营权分离[J].中国经济问题,2003(3):14-22. 被引量:5

二级参考文献47

  • 1周其仁.市场里的企业:一个人力资本与非人力资本的特别合约[J].经济研究,1996,31(6):71-79. 被引量:2175
  • 2张维迎.所有制、治理结构及委托—代理关系———兼评崔之元和周其仁的一些观点[J].经济研究,1996,31(9):3-15. 被引量:1551
  • 3多纳德·海和莫里斯.《产业经济学与组织》第9章[M].经济科学出版社,2001年版..
  • 4詹森 麦克林.《企业理论:管理行为、代理成本与所有权结构》[A]..《所有权、控制权与激励》[C].上海三 联书店,上海人民出版社,1998年版..
  • 5法马.《代理问题与企业理论》[A]..《所有权、控制权与激励》[C].上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1998年版..
  • 6法马 詹森.《所有权与控制权的分离》[A]..《所有权、控制权与激励》[C].上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1998年版..
  • 7多纳德·海和莫里斯的.《产业经济学与组织》第9章[M].,..
  • 8.《资本论》第1卷[M].,.第398页.
  • 9刘易斯·卡布罗的.《产业组织导论》第7章[M].人民邮电出版社,..
  • 10方伟翰 哈拉德维泽 罗敏译.市场竞争中的企业策略[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2000.106-116.

共引文献19

同被引文献48

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部