摘要
目的评价检测CYFRA21┐1对非小细胞肺癌的诊断价值。方法用ELISA法测定70例肺癌(LC)其中47例非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),3例小细胞肺癌(SCLC)和20例未分型肺癌、64例肺部良性疾病患者及40例健康人血清CYFRA21┐1浓度。试验的诊断性能用相对操作特征(ROC)分析法估测之。结果测得全阈诊断准确率(OveralDiag┐nosticAccuracies)LC为0.75、NSCLC为0.76,SQC为0.83,ADE为0.67和SCLC为0.38。在相应于特异性为0.95的界定值3.47μg/L处,各型的灵敏度分别为SQC0.62,LC0.53,NSCLC0.51,ADE0.48和SCLC0.00。结论结果显示CYFRA21┐1是NSCLC较灵敏和特异的一个标志物。未观察到TNM各期间该标志物的平均水平有明显的差异;然而异常升高水平的患者的比例随病期的进展而显著增加,提示一系列检测CYFRA21┐1水平可能有助于监查NSCLC患者的疗效。
Objective:To evaluate the usefullness of CYFRA 21 1 assay in the diagnosis of non small cell lung cancer.Methods:Concentrations of CYFRA 21 1 were determined by ELISA in sera from 70 patients with lung cancer (LC) (47 NSCLC, 3 SCLC and 20 untyping LC),64 with benign lung diseases (BLD)and 40 healthy donors (HD). The diagnostic performance was estimated by relative operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results:The overall diagnostic accuracies were 0.75 for LC, 0.76 for NSCLC, 0.83 for squamous carcinoma(SQC), 0.67 for adenocarcinoma (ADE) and 0.38 for SCLC.By using a cut off value of 3.47 μg/L at specificity equal to 0.95,the sensitivities attained to 0.62 for for SQC,0.53 for LC, 0.51 for NSCLC, 0.48 for ADE and 0.00 for SCLC respectively. Conclusions:The results showed that CYFRA 21 1 was a more sensitive and specific marker for NSCLC, especially for SQC. Insignificant difference was observed in average levels of this marker between the TNM stages; however,proportions of the patients with NSCLC that showed abnormally elevated levels of the marker significantly with the progress of the stage, suggesting that a serial assays of the marker may be useful in monitoring therapeutic effects on NSCLC.
出处
《肿瘤》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
1997年第5期258-261,共4页
Tumor
关键词
肺肿瘤
血清
CYFRA21-1
ELISA
诊断
Lung neoplasms Cancer, Non Small Cell Serum CYFRA 21 1 ELISA Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis