期刊文献+

任务类型对二语词汇习得的影响与启示 被引量:5

Task types' influence and enlightenment on second language acquisition of vocabulary
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以投入量假说和输出假说为理论基础,通过一次实验、一次词汇习得测试和一次访谈,揭示中国中低水平英语学习者在阅读中附带习得词汇的一些规律。主要发现有:1、不同的阅读任务均能有效地促进二语词汇的附带习得;2、投入量假设不完全正确,投入指数的界定有待进一步细化;3、输出型任务比输入型任务更能促进词汇的习得;4、在视觉输入模式下,隐性语境比无语境更能促进阅读中任务引发的词汇习得,且差异显著。 This paper employs one experiment, one vocabulary acquisition test and one interview to study the acquisition of vocabulary on five text-based tasks by Chinese low-intermediate learners of English. Involvement-load hypothesis and output hypothesis are its theoretical bases. The analysis of data reveals: 1) different text--based tasks can significantly affect L2 vocabulary learning; 2) output tasks are much more effective than input tasks; 3) implicit elaboration has more facilitative powers than null elaborations for L2 vocabulary learning through text-based tasks. The findings have significant implications for English vocabulary pedagogy.
出处 《安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第1期40-44,共5页 Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 阅读任务 投入量假说 输出假说 语境阐述 reading tasks involvement-load hypothesis output hypothesis context elaborations
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[1]Laufer B & J.H.Hulstijn.Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language[J].Applied Linguistics,2001(1):1-26.
  • 2[2]Craik F I M & R.S.Lockhart.Levels of processing:A framework for memory research[J].Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1972(11):671-684.
  • 3[3]Hulstijn J B & B.Laufer.Some empirical evidences for the involvement hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition[J].Language Learning,2001,51(3):539-558.
  • 4黄燕.检验“投入量假设”的实证研究——阅读任务对中国学生词汇记忆的影响[J].现代外语,2004,27(4):386-394. 被引量:162
  • 5胡亮.参与负荷量假说及其验证发现[J].邵阳学院学报(社会科学版),2005,4(4):115-117. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Ellis E & X.He.The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings[J].SSLA,1999(21):285-301.
  • 7[7]Zhou Weijing.Unpublished doctorial dissertation:An experimental study of task-based L2 lexical learning by English Majors in Chinese University[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University,2006.
  • 8柯葳,董燕萍.上下文在二语词汇直接学习中的效果研究[J].现代外语,2001,24(4):352-358. 被引量:56
  • 9[9]Nation I S P.Learning vocabulary in another language[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001.
  • 10[10]Paribakht T S & M.Wesche.Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading:A hierarchy of text-related exercise types[J].The Canadian Modern Language Review,1996(52):154-178.

二级参考文献81

共引文献349

同被引文献44

  • 1黄燕.检验“投入量假设”的实证研究——阅读任务对中国学生词汇记忆的影响[J].现代外语,2004,27(4):386-394. 被引量:162
  • 2武卫 ,许洪 .附带性学习环境中基于语篇的不同任务对词汇习得产生的影响[J].山东外语教学,2004,25(6):28-31. 被引量:54
  • 3许洪,武卫.通过阅读附带学习英语词汇的实证研究[J].外国语言文学,2007,24(2):113-117. 被引量:18
  • 4Coad,J.,& Thomas.H.(2001).Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition.上海:上海外语教育出版社.
  • 5Fraser,C.A.1999.Lexical processing strategy use an vocabulary learning through reading,Studies in Second Language Acquisition,21,225-241.
  • 6Hu,M.& Nation,I.S.P.(2001).[in press mentioned in Nation J.Vocabulary density and reading comprehension.Reading in a Foreign Language.
  • 7Hulstijn,J.H.,& B.Laufer.(2001).Some empirical evidence for the Involvement Load Hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition.Language Learning,51:3,539-558.
  • 8Laufer,B.(1989).What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension?In C.Lauren and M.Nontman(eds.):Special Language:From Humang Thinking to Thinking Machines.Clemedon:Muhilingual Matters.
  • 9Laufer,B.(1992).How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension?In Arnaud & Béjoint(eds.),1992.Vocabulary and applied linguistics.Basingstoke:Macmillan.
  • 10Laufer,B.(1994).The lexical profile of second language writing:does it change over time?RELC Journal 25(Ⅰ):21-33.

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部