期刊文献+

基于信息修正的非期望效用模型 被引量:6

A Non-Expected Utility Model Based on Info-modification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人们对事件发生的可能性存在着主观判断。在不同的概率区间,人们对概率变化的敏感度是不一样的。传统的期望效用理论忽视了决策者对概率的主观反应,无法准确描述风险决策行为。基于信息修正的非期望效用模型,将客观概率转换成主观决策权重,可以弥补期望效用模型在捕捉决策者对概率主观反应方面的缺陷;同时,利用基于信息修正的非期望效用模型,通过量化人们在购买保险或股票时对风险的主观概率判断,可以对人们的保险需求和证券投资行为作出更好的解释或预测。 In this paper, we review the shortcomings of the application of expected utility theory and its improvements made by theoreticians-the development of non-expected utility theory, analyze the factors that affect decision-makers' judgments and information's modification for it, construct a decision-weighted function base on conditional probability and info-modification, transform objective probabilities to subjective decision weights, then develop a non-expected utility model based on these subjective decision weights. Such a model will betterinterpret and forecast the insurance need and security investment behavior, which is also the next research focus of the paper.
机构地区 厦门大学金融系
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期42-51,共10页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 教育部人文社科基地重大项目(05JJD790026) 教育部新世纪优秀人才资助项目
关键词 决策权重 条件概率 信息修正 非期望效用 decision weights conditional Probability info-modification, non-expected utility
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Chris Starmer. Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2000, 38: 332-382.
  • 2Savage J. The foundations of Statistics[M]. New York: Wiley, 1954.
  • 3Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions[J]. Experimental Psychology, 1971, 89: 46-55.
  • 4Slovic P. The Construction of Preferences[J]. America Psychologist, 1995, 50: 364-371.
  • 5Loomes G, Sugden R. A Rationale for Preference Reversal[J]. America Economic Review, 1983, 73: 428-432.
  • 6Tversky A, Kahneman D. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice[J]. Science, 1981, 211: 453-458.
  • 7Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions[J]. Journal of Business, 1986, 59(4): 251-278.
  • 8Machina J. "Expected Utility" Theory without the Independence Axiom[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50: 277-323.
  • 9Machina J.. Expected utility/subjective probability analysis without the sure-thing principle or probabilistic sophistication [J]. Economic Theory, 2005, 26: 1-62.
  • 10Jullien B, Salanie B. Estimating Preferences under Risk: The Case of Racetrack Bettors [J]. Journal of Political Economy,1997, 108: 503-530.

同被引文献57

  • 1冯跃.航意险突围垄断[J].中国保险,2005(2):28-29. 被引量:1
  • 2吕泉,武亚光,李卫东.基于SP/A理论的发电商报价决策模型[J].电力系统自动化,2006,30(4):29-34. 被引量:9
  • 3Virginia, R. , and Mark, J. , Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets Under Adverse Selection and Yaari Dual Theory of Risk[J]. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory,2000,25 <2 > :141 - 157.
  • 4郑振龙 何凯浩.主观期望效用模型在保险产品定价中的应用.金融评论,2007,(2).
  • 5Andy A Tsay,Narendra Agrawal.Channel conflict and coordination in ECommerce age[J].Production and Operations Management,2004,13(1):93-120.
  • 6Doron Kliger,Ori Levy.Theories of choice under risk:Insights from financial markets[J].Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2009.
  • 7Gregory Gurevich,Doron Kliger,Ori Levy.Decision-making under uncertainty-A field study of cumulative prospect theory[J].Journal of Banking & Finance,2009,33:1221-1229.
  • 8Han Bleichrodt,Louis Eeckhoudt.Survival risks,intertemporal consumption and insurance:The case of distorted probabilities[J].Mathematics and Economics,2006,38:335-346.
  • 9Kevin L.Webb.Managing channels of distribution in the age of electronic commerce[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2002,31(1):95-102.
  • 10Niklas Aldin,Fredrik Stahre.Electronic commerce,marketing channels and logistics platforms-a wholesaler perspective[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2003,144(1):270-279.

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部