罗尔斯的正当性证明问题研究被引量：1

A Review on the Studies of Rawls's Justification

下载PDF

导出

摘要罗尔斯的正当性证明问题在英美政治哲学界一直是研究的重点,国内则相对缺乏总体研究。罗尔斯正当性证明的方法是和其理论紧密联系在一起的,但是由于他同时运用了几种不同的方法,导致人们对这些方法之间关系的理解上产生了各种不同的观点。 Under the model of adversary trial and in the usage of evidence, the judge should be roles as the person who remains neutral, the person who enjoys the powers of judgment, and the person who is persuaded. However sometimes the judge deviates from his roles mentioned above in judicial practice. It is necessary to return the judge to his original roles, in order to guarantee successful operation of adversary trial and re - establish the authority of justice.

作者丛占修

机构地区北京大学哲学系

出处《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期10-14,34,共6页 Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

关键词罗尔斯正当性证明契约主义反思平衡构成主义 adversary trial neutrality judgment persuaded

分类号 B82 [哲学宗教—伦理学] G633.6 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1[1]Wayne Norman.'Inevitable and Unacceptable?' Methodological Rawlsianism in Anglo-America Political Philosophy[J].Political Studies,1998,(XLVL):276-294.
2[2]John Rawls.A Theory of Justice[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1999.
3[3]John Rawls.Political Liberalism[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1993.
4[4]T.M.Scanlon.Rawls on Justification[M]// Samuel Freeman.The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,Cambridge University Press,2003,139-167.
5莱斯诺夫．社会契约论[M]．刘训练.等译，南京：江苏人民出版社，2005．
6[6]Jean Hampton.Contracts and Choices:Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?[J].Journal of Philosophy.1980 (6):315-338.
7[3]桑德尔.自由主义与正义的局限[M].万俊人,译.南京:译林出版社,2001.
8[9]Samuel Freeman.Reason and Agreement in Social Contract Views[J].Philosophy and Public Affairs,1990 (19):122-157.
9[10]Cynthia A.Stark.Hypothetical Consent and Justification[J].The Journal of Philosophy,2000 (6):313-334.
10[11]Norman Daniels.Justice and Justification--Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice[M]New York:Cambridge University Press,1996.

二级参考文献6

1康德韩水法译.实践理性批判[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001..
2[1]Krititk der reinen Vernuft.
3[3]康德.道德形而上学原理[M].上海人民出版社,1986.
4[4]Rawls. Political Liberalism [ M ]. New York: ColumbiaUniversity Press, 1996.
5[5]Rawls. A Theory of Justice [M]. Cambridge: The Belknappress of Harvand University Press, 1971.
6[8]原文如下:"We adopt a constructivist view to speify the fair terms of social cooperation as given bythe princlples of justiceagreed to by the representative of free and equal citizen when fairly situated."Political Lieralism,97页.