期刊文献+

论比喻性语言意义凸显的认知阐释 被引量:3

On Cognitive Evidence of Figurative Language's Sense Salience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比喻性语言是一种语用多义结构。在认知过程中人们如何理解比喻性语言的语义,具体说来究竟是哪种语义最先为人们所认知,在语言学界有不同的解释。本文认同G iora提出的"层级意义凸显假说",解释了意义凸显的体现形式,并对比喻性语言的意义凸显进行了认知阐释。 Figurative language is a kind of polysemous structure in use. In linguistics, there are different interpretations as to how to understand figurative language, i.e. which meaning being obtained by the hearer. This thesis approves the " Graded Salience Hypothesis" suggested by Rachel Giora, explains the forms of "salience of sense", and then provides cognitive evidence for the sense salience of figurative Language.
作者 周树江
出处 《北京第二外国语学院学报》 2008年第4期58-61,78,共5页 Journal of Beijing International Studies University
基金 山东省教育厅人文社科项目"语篇形义错位现象研究"阶段性成果 (项目编号:S07WF37)
关键词 比喻性语言 意义凸显 认知阐释 figurative language sense salience cognitive evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Giora,R.When Is Relevance? On the Role of Salience in Utterance Interpretation[J].Revista Allcantina de Estudios Ingleses,1998,(11):85~94.
  • 2[2]Giora,R.Literal vs.Figurative Language:Different or Equal?[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2002,(34):447~506.
  • 3[3]Grice,H.P,Logic and Conversation[A].In:P.Cole & J.L.Morgan,eds.,Syntax and Semantics[C],vol.3:Speech Acts.New York:Academic Press,1975:41~58.
  • 4[4]Sperber,D & Wilson,D.Relevance:Communication and Cognition[M].Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1986.
  • 5[5]Steven,F & Martin,J.P.Obtaining a Figurative Interpretation of a Word:Support for Underspecification[J].Metaphor and Symbol,2001,(16):149~171.
  • 6[6]Ungerer,F & H.J.Schimid.An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001.
  • 7刘正光.分级显性意义假说——语义处理新理论[J].现代外语,2002,25(2):210-220. 被引量:16
  • 8熊学亮.语用学和认知语境[J].外语学刊,1996(3):1-7. 被引量:215

二级参考文献38

  • 1Attardo, S. 2000. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32:793-826.
  • 2Clark, H.H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 3Clark, H.H. & R.J. Gerrig, 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113( 1 ): 121-126.
  • 4Coulson, S & C.V. Petten. 2001. Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. html version, Coulson Homepage.
  • 5Coulson, S. & K.D. Federmeier. 2001. Words in context: ERPs and the lexical/postlexical distinction. html version, Coulson Homepage.
  • 6Dews, S. & E. Winner. 1999. Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meaning in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1579-1599.
  • 7Dews, S. & E. Winner. 1995. Muting the meaning: A social function of irony..Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10:3-19.
  • 8Gemsbacher, M.A. & R.R.W. Robertson. 1999. The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1619-1630.
  • 9Gibbs, R.W. 1986. On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115:3-15.
  • 10Gibbs, R.W. Jr. 2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 33.

共引文献229

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部