期刊文献+

组织信誉缺失的微观机理研究 被引量:1

Study on Microcosmic Mechanism of Reputation Loss
下载PDF
导出
摘要 已有的研究倾向于将组织信誉缺失的原因归结为法制不完善、政府监管不力、地方保护主义等外部原因,而忽视了基于交易关系的微观机理分析。交易关系是现代经济活动的基本关系,任何组织都是由基于一系列委托代理关系的契约交易链条组成的。信誉缺失问题正是伴随内部及外部交易行为发生的。交易活动可以分为简单交易活动和复杂交易活动,后者信誉缺失的机理虽然在单个交易环节上与前者相似,但整体上与前者不同并且复杂得多。不同产权类型组织信誉缺失的原因在于治理结构及激励结构的差异,以及由此引起的内部交易中信誉问题向外部市场的传导,产权类型的差异不是信誉缺失的唯一原因。 Fonner studies tend to ascribe the reputation losing of organizations to such as legal, regulation, local protection, and culture reasons, but reasons of microcosmic level based on transaction and on internal mechanism of organizations are ignored. Whereas, transactional relation is the basic relation in modem economic activities, and any organization can be multiplexed by transactional relation based on principal - agent relation. The problem of reputation loss just accompanies interior and exterior transactional activities. Transactional activities can be divided into simple transaction and complex transaction. Although at the single juncture the mechanism of the latter' s reputation lore and that of the former are similar, on the whole the mechanism of the latter is different from and more complex than that of the former. Difference between reasons of reputation loss of organizations with different property right types lies in difference of govemess structure and incentive structure, which rises to reputation problems of interior transaction to conduct to exterior markets, but is not the only reason of reputation less.
作者 张朝孝
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 2008年第4期70-76,共7页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然基金项目(70502028) 河南省普通高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(XZ2006106)
关键词 信誉缺失 交易关系 微观机理 reputation loss transaction relation microcosmic mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

  • 1王珏.诚信:企业核心竞争力实现的关键[J].商业研究,2005(3):85-87. 被引量:8
  • 2[1]R.H. Bates. The Preservation of Order in State Less Societies: A Reinterpretation of Evans-Pritchard's The Nuer [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1983.
  • 3[4]K.J.Arrow. The limits of organization [M]. New York: W.W.Norton, 1974.
  • 4[6]D. Kreps. Corporate Culture and Economic Theory [Z]. mimeo, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1984.
  • 5[7]E. Fama. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980.
  • 6菲利普 科特勒.营销管理[M].上海人民出版社,1997..
  • 7Coyle, J. and Schnarr, N. (1995). The soft-side challenge of the virtual corporation. Human Resource Planning. 15, 41-42.
  • 8Grundy, T. 1998. How are corporate strategy and human resource strategy linked? Journal of General Management 23 (3): 49-72.
  • 9Jarvenpaa S L, Leidner D E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 1999, 10:791- 815.
  • 10Marc Pilisuk and Paul Skohaick. Inducing Trust: A Test of the Osgood Proposal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1968,8(2):121-133.

共引文献38

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部