摘要
关于《山海经》中《海内经》所记"西南有巴国"的巴国地望,笔者曾对鄂西香炉石遗址出土大量我国早期巴文化遗物和安阳殷墟出土甲骨文中多有"巴方"的记载所进行的考察,恰与湖北大学刘先枚教授及台湾成功大学李冕世教授合撰的《安州六器考及附记》一文对"虎方"和"巴方"地望的考证不谋而合,均认为是在今鄂西清江长阳一带。这说明通过出土文物来证史的这一科学方法所得出的结论,应是准确和可靠的。至于《山海经》所记"巴国"的年代,当是我国上古时期无疑,即距今4000—3000年之间。
The author researched a large number of materials of cultural relics excavated from Censer Stone Site in West Hubei and the inscriptions on bones or tortoise shell about Baguo excavated in Anyang.The researches is just the same with the researches by professor Liu xiammei from Hubei University and professor Li Mianshi from Taiwan Chenggong University,who thought Hufang and Bafang are the place called around qingjian and Changyang nowadays.They showed that the way to prove history through excavated cultural relics is correct and reliable.As for "the year of Baguo",it should be remote ages,about 4000-3000years ago.
出处
《福建师大福清分校学报》
2008年第3期4-7,共4页
Journal of Fuqing Branch of Fujian Normal University
关键词
巴方
虎方
《山海经》
西南巴国
鄂西长阳一带
准确可靠
Bafang, Hufang, ShaqnghaiJing, Baguo in southwest, Around Changyang in West Hubei, Correct and reliable