期刊文献+

组织内控制权分配:机制设计的视角 被引量:5

The Allocation of Authority in Organization:Organizzational Design Mechanism Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 组织内控制权分配是一项契约安排,合理的控制权分配可以节约组织内的交易成本。一个可以观察到的趋势是,经济学家越来越关注于组织内控制权或者权威的研究,试图通过对组织内控制权或权威的探讨来研究提高组织绩效的方向。企业组织里的权威或者控制权是可以转让的,控制权分配发生于组织内的委托人和代理人之间,具体而言是发生在组织内的领导和下属之间。一个不断困扰经济学家及其他学者的重要问题是:组织内的控制权是如何分配的?沿着这样一个总体思路,本文从以下几个角度深入分析和评述了组织内的控制权分配理论的进展:(1)显示原理;(2)通讯成本与契约复杂性;(3)信息处理;(4)串谋;(5)再谈判与不完全契约。这些理论总结将有助于深入研究组织设计以及决策效率等现代企业理论中的关键问题。 The allocation of authority is a contract arrangement, which may reduce the transaction cost in the firm. The contemporary economists begin to pay more attention to the research of authority in the organization and try to find the way to enhance the performance of organization through the research. The author- ity depends on the ownership for its existence, which means the stockholder(s) of the company owns the authority and could determine the allocation of authority. The current situation for the firm is the separation of ownership and authority, and the managers have the authority. The authority in a firm is transferable and could be allocated between the leader and the subordinate. An important question bothering economists is: What kinds of factors determine the organizations' forms? Or under what conditions the company will choose centralization or decentralization? The second issue is how to allocate the authority to motivate the agent release private information? What factors will influence the delegation? How does the allocation affect the information release in an organization? The third issue is based on the previous two and recognizes that there exists opportunism in the organization and opportunism by the agent will cause the transaction cost. Could the principal utilize the contract tool and sign different contract with different agents to increase the efficiency of the authority? Then, how to overcome the opportunism by designing different contract mechanism? Following the above-mentioned research design and raised prob- lems, this article reviews and analyses the development of the theory of allocation of authority from the following perspectives: (1) Revelation Principle; (2) Communication Cost and Contract Com- plexity ;(3) Information processing; (4) Collusion; (5) Incomplete Commitment, Renegotiation and Incomplete Contract. These theo- ries related mechanism design will promote the further research on some key issues of modern enterprise theory, such as Organization Design and Decision Efficiency.
作者 汪建新
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 2008年第2期61-68,共8页 Nankai Business Review
关键词 控制权 显示原理 契约 串谋 Authority Revelation Principle Contract Collusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Coase, Roland H.. The Nature of the Firm. Econommica, 1937: 368-405.
  • 2阿道夫·A.伯利,加德纳·C.米恩斯.现代公司与私有财产(中译本).商务印书馆,2005.
  • 3Aghion, P., J. Tirole. Formal and Real Authority in Organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, (105): 1-29.
  • 4张军,王祺.权威、企业绩效与国有企业改革[J].中国社会科学,2004(5):106-116. 被引量:76
  • 5Hermanlin, B.. Toward an Economic Theory of Leadership: Leading by Example. AER, 1998, 88(5): 1188-1206.
  • 6Myerson R.. Incentive Compatibility and Bargaining Problems. Econometrica, 1979, (47): 61-74.
  • 7Myerson R.. Optimal Coordination Mechanisms in Generalized Principal Agent Problems. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1982, 1(6): 67-81.
  • 8Baron, D. P., D. Besanko. Information, Control, and Organizational Structure. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1992, (1): 237-275.
  • 9Melumand, Nahum, Dilip Mookherjee, Stefan Reichelstein. A Theory of Responsibility Centers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1992, (15): 445-484.
  • 10Melumand, Nahum, Dilip Mookherjee, Stefan Reichelstein. Hierarchical Decentralization of Incentive Contracts. Rand Journal of Economics, 1995, 26(4): 654-672.

二级参考文献13

  • 1季稻葵.转型经济中的模糊产权理论[J].经济研究,1995,30(4):42-50. 被引量:182
  • 2刘小玄.现代企业的激励机制:剩余支配权[J].经济研究,1996,31(5):3-11. 被引量:114
  • 3王珺.国有企业的经济绩效分析[J].经济研究,1996,31(8):37-45. 被引量:17
  • 4冯曲.《权威、权威组织与效率》[J].《复旦经济评论》,2001,(1).
  • 5Roland H. Coase, The Nature of the Firm. Econommica, 1937, pp. 368--405.
  • 6Justin, Yifu Lin, Fang Cai and Zhou Li, Competition, Policy Burdens, and State-Owned Enterprise Reform.American Economic Review, vol. 88, no. 2, 1998.
  • 7Armen A. Alchian and H. Demsetz, Production, Information Costs and Economic Orgnization. American Economic Review, vol. 62, 1972.
  • 8G. Jefferson and T. Rawski, Enterprise Reform in Chinese Industry. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8,no. 2, 1994.
  • 9T. Wing, Woo, Wen Hai, Yibiao Jin and Gang Fan, How Successful has Chinese Enterprises Reform Been.Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 18, 1994.
  • 10M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckhng, Theory of the Finn: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 3, 1976.

共引文献75

同被引文献63

引证文献5

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部