期刊文献+

夏大豆不同种植方式对土壤水分及水分利用效率的影响 被引量:3

Planting Patterns Affects Soil Water and Water Use Efficiency of Summer Soybean
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对夏大豆不同种植方式下土壤水分及水分利用效率变化进行分析。在同一密度(3.09×10^5株·hm^-2)下设5种分布方式,即行距×株距分别为A:18cm×18cm,B:27cm×12cm,C:36cm×9cm,D:54cm×6cm,E:81cm×4cm。结果表明:在夏大豆生育期间,受降雨影响,0—90cm土壤含水量与土壤贮水量均呈现“三峰”曲线特点;土壤含水量在各个生育阶段均呈现“Z”型曲线,深层变化幅度相对较小且较稳定,生育阶段各处理土壤贮水量平均值顺序为D〉A〉E〉C〉B;A、B、C处理在0—90cm平均变异系数总水平高于D、E处理;水分利用效率(WUE)与行距呈显著负相关(r=-0.9818^**),与产量呈显著正相关(r=0.9861^**),其中,A、B、C处理WUE极显著高于D和E处理,E处理极显著低于其它处理(P〈0.01)。 Previous research stated that furrow-bed planting and different plant densities affect water use efficiency(WUE) of summer soybean significantly. In order to find out the character of WUE under different population distribution patterns, and effects of planting patterns on soil water of summer soybean in Tai' an city, Shandong province, field trail was designed consisting of 5 distribution patterns under the same plant population (3.09 × 10^5 plant hm^-2 ), and row spacing (cm) plant spacing(cm) was A(18 cm×l8 cm),B(27 cm×12 cm),C(36 cm×9 cm),D(54 cm×6 cm),E(81 cm×4 cm) respectively. The results showed that soil moisture content(SMC) and soil storage water(SSW) in 0 - 90 cm soil changed as a"three peaks"curve respectively. SMC in 0 - 90 cm soil fluctuated as a"Z"trend and the changes were very insignificant in the 60- 90 cm soll profile. Order of average value of SSW were D 〉 A 〉 E 〉 C 〉 B in growth period for all treatments. The total level of variance coefficients of A, B and C were higher than D and E treatments. WUE had a negative correlation (r = -0. 981 8 ^** )with row spacing, and a positive correlation( r = 0. 986 1 ^** ) with yield. The WUE of A, B and C treatments were significantly higher than D and E treatments, and that of E treatment significantly lower than other treatments (P 〈 0.01).
出处 《大豆科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期247-250,共4页 Soybean Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划资助项目(2005CB121106)
关键词 夏大豆 种植方式 土壤水分 水分利用效率 Summer soybean Planting pattern Soil water Water use efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1Mishra H S.Rathore T R,Tomar Ⅴ S.Root growth,water potential and yield of irrigated wheat[J].Irrig.Sci.,1999,18:117-123.
  • 2Singh R.Role of soil texture and plant age in leaf water potential measured at different crop stages of wheat in Mollisols of Tarai[J].J.Indian Soc..Soil.Sci.,1995,43;327-330.
  • 3Blum A.Crop responses tO drought and the interpretation of adaptation[J].Plant Growth Reg.,1996,20:135-148.
  • 4Bray E A.Molecular responses to water deficits[J].Plant Physiol.,199l3,103:1035-1040.
  • 5Gunasekera D,Berkowitz G A.Evaluation of contrasting cellular-level acclimation responses to leaf water deficits in three wheat genotypes[J].Plant Sci.,1992,86:1-12.
  • 6Philip E,Mustafa P.Crop row spacing and its influence on the partitioning of evapotranspiration by winter-grown wheat in Northern Syria[J].Plant and Soil,2005,268:195-208.
  • 7Gadallah M A A.Effects of kinetin on growth,grain yield and some mineral elements in wheat plants growing under excess salinity and oxygen deficiency[J].Plant Growth Regulation,1999,27:63-74.
  • 8梁宗锁,康绍忠,邵明安,魏永胜,张建华.土壤干湿交替对玉米生长速度及其耗水量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2000,16(5):38-40. 被引量:28
  • 9胡继超,姜东,曹卫星,罗卫红.短期干旱对水稻叶水势、光合作用及干物质分配的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(1):63-67. 被引量:124

共引文献42

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部