期刊文献+

大豆疫霉根腐病菌毒素对抗感不同大豆品种叶片超微结构的影响

Effect of Pathotoxin Produced from Phytophthora sojae on the Ultrastructure of Leaves of Soybean Varieties with Different Resistance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 毒素是大豆疫霉根腐病的主要致病因子之一,而毒素对大豆细胞超微结构的影响还未见报道,用不同浓度的毒素处理抗感不同大豆品种的叶片,为揭示毒素在细胞水平的致病机理及寄主抗毒素的机理奠定一定的理论基础。结果表明,较高浓度大豆疫霉根腐病菌毒素(稀释50倍,浓度为0.1794mg·mL-1)处理抗感不同大豆品种的离体叶片后,不论是抗病品种还是感病品种叶片细胞内部结构都遭到了明显的破坏。适宜浓度的毒素(稀释100倍,浓度为0.0897mg·mL-1)处理抗感品种离体叶片后,抗病品种细胞内部结构基本上比较完整,而感病品种叶片细胞内部结构已经发生了较大的变化,叶绿体嵴变形,基粒片层已经基本消失,叶绿体膜已经解体,线粒体空泡化严重。说明只有在适宜浓度毒素处理下,才能在细胞超微结构上区分出抗感品种在抗性上的差异。 Pathotoxin is one of the main pathogenic factors of Phytophthora sojae, which could destroy the cell structure of soybean. To investigate the effect of pathotoxin on cell ultrastructure of soybean, two soybean varieties of Suinong 10 ( resistant to Phytophthora sojae) and Hefeng 25 ( susceptible to Phytophthora sojae) were used in this experiment. The excised leaves of the two soybean varieties were dipped into the pathotoxin solution with different concentration( one is the pathotoxin solution of relatively high concentration,0. 1794 mg · mL^-1 ;the other is pathotoxin solution of optimal concentration ,0. 0897 mg · mL ^-1 ) ,and fixed in the fixation solution after 48 h and 72 h. The ultrastructures of leaves of Suinong 10 and Hefeng 25 were all seriously destroyed after treated with relatively high concentration of pathotoxin solution. The ultrastructure of leaves of resistant soybean Suinong 10 was almost intact after treated with optimal concentration of pathotoxin, but the cell structure of susceptible variety Hefeng 25 changed a lot. The chloroplast grana nearly disappeared, chondriosome appeared vacuolus, and chondriosome envelope disaggregated. The results showed that only optimal concentration of pathotoxin solution could distinguish the difference in cell structure between soybean varieties resistant or susceptible to Phytophthora sojae.
出处 《大豆科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期288-291,295,共5页 Soybean Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30400285,30671317) 中国博士后基金资助项目(20060400835) 黑龙江省教育厅新世纪人才基金资助项目(NCET-06-007) 黑龙江省高校骨干教师资助项目项目(1151G007) 黑龙江省农科院博士后基金资助项目(LRB06-010) 农业部寒地重点开放实验室开放课题 博士后落户黑龙江启动基金资助项目(LBH-Q05032) 黑龙江省青年基金资助项目(QC06C012)
关键词 大豆疫霉根腐病 毒素 抗感品种 超微结构 Phytophthora sojae Pathotoxin Varieties with different resistance Ultrastructure
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Schmitthenner A F. Problems and progress in control of Phytophthora root rot of soybean [ J ]. Plant Disease, 1985,69 (4): 362- 368.
  • 2Hildebrand A A. A root and stalk rot of soybeans caused by Phytophthora Megasperma Drechsler var. sojae var [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1959,37 : 927- 957.
  • 3Pegg K G, Kochman J K, Vock N T. Root and stem rot of soybean caused by Phytophthora megasperma var. sojae [J]. Australasian Plant Pathology, 1980,9 : 15.
  • 4Ryley M J,Obst N R,Irwin J A G,et al. Changes in the racial composition of Phytophthora sojae in Australia between 1979 and 1996 [ J ]. Plant Disease, 1998,82 : 1048-1054
  • 5Jee H, Kim W, Cho W. Occurance of Phytophthora root rot on soybean( Glycine max) and indentification of the causal fungus [ J ]. Journal of Crop Protection, 1998,40 ( 1 ) : 16- 22.
  • 6Wrather J A,Anderson T R, Arsyad D M, et al. Soybean disease loss estimates for the top ten soybean-producing countries in 1998 [ J]. Canadian Journal Plant Pathology,2001,23:115 - 121.
  • 7沈崇尧 苏彦纯.中国大豆疫霉病菌的发现及初步研究[J].植物病理学报,1991,21(4):298-298.
  • 8韩晓增,何志鸿,张增敏.大豆主要病虫害防治技术——大豆重迎茬减产控制及主要病虫害防治技术专题研究取得重大进展[J].大豆通报,1998(6):5-6. 被引量:32
  • 9马淑梅,李宝英.大豆疫霉根腐病菌生理小种鉴定结果初报[J].大豆科学,1999,18(2):151-153. 被引量:68
  • 10许修宏,吕慧颖,杨庆凯,张喜萍,商承伟,付立恒,张桂珍.大豆疫霉根腐病抗源筛选[J].大豆科学,1999,18(2):147-150. 被引量:21

二级参考文献22

共引文献148

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部