摘要
弗雷格借助间接意谓试图说明间接语境同一替换失效问题。但罗素并不赞同弗雷格的处理方法,而是提出摹状词理论,以解答这个长期困扰人们的难题。研究表明,无论是弗雷格抑或罗素的方案都没有抓住问题的关键,最终皆失败了。实际上,问题的关键在于命题态度词,出路是区分认知程度。
Frege tried to explain the identity puzzle in indirect contexts by using indirect -reference. But Russell didn't agreed with this method, and put forward the theory of descriptions to resolve the issue that usually puzzling us. However, they didn't tackled the key of the puzzle, and both failed. In fact, the key just being the attitude words of indirect proposition, and the solution is to distinguish the degree of cognition.
基金
贵州省2007年教育厅高校人文社科研究青年项目"意义
心灵与认知研究"
项目编号:0704230
毕节学院哲学社会科学研究一般项目"弗雷格疑难与认知价值差异研究"。项目编号:20071015
关键词
弗雷格
罗素
摹状词
间接语境
同一替换律
Frege
Russel
Descriptions
Indirect Contexts
Law of Identity