期刊文献+

老年人无保护左主干病变经桡动脉途径介入治疗 被引量:1

Transradial percutaneous coronary interventional therapy for the elderly patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经桡动脉途径PCI在老年人无保护左主干病变(UPLMT)中的疗效和安全性。方法65岁以上的UPLMT患者28例择期行PCI,其中开口部6例,体部4例,分叉部18例,所有患者均置入药物洗脱支架。术后每半个月或1个月门诊复查1次,其中19例患者3~6个月行冠状动脉造影复查。结果28例患者PCI均取得成功,术后达TIMI3级血流,住院期间主要不良心脏事件1例,冠状动脉造影复查显示,支架内再狭窄1例(5.3%),再次行PCI。术后平均随访(18.6±2.7)个月,随访1年内无死亡。结论选择性经桡动脉老年UPLMT患者行PCI即刻成功率高,其近中期疗效可以被接受。 Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of transradial percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) therapy using the drug eluting stent (DES) in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease (UPLMT). Methods Between June 2005 and June 2007, a total of 28 consecutive patients with UPLMT were treated with elective PCI. All patients employed drug-eluting stents for the left main coronary artery, including 6 cases of ostial lesions, 4 midshaft and 18 bifurcation lesions. The patients enrolled in the study underwent clinical evaluation every half or one month after the procedure. Routine coronary angiography was performed 3 to 6 months after the procedure and angiographic follow-up was carried out in 680/oo of the patients (19/28). Results Procedure success was achieved in 28 patients with UPLMT. The stenosis related arteries had TIMI 3 flow at the end of the procedure. The in-hospital major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 3. 57%. Restenosis was observed in 1 patient, for whom repeated PCI was performed. There was no death during 12-month follow-up. Mean clinical follow-up period was 18.6±2.7 months. Conclusion Transradial percutaneous coronary interventional therapy for the treatment of UPLMT appears to be safe and feasible for selected aged patients and can bring about good immediate or medium-term outcomes.
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第5期347-349,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 桡动脉 支架 放射摄影术 介入性 coronary disease radial artery stents radliography, inteiventional
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Seung J P,Seong WP,Myeong KH,et al. Long-term( three year ) outcomes after stenting of unprotected left main coro nary artery stenosis in patients with normal left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol,2003,91:12-16.
  • 2Lee SW, Hong MK, Lee CW, et al. Early and late clinical outcomes after primary stenting of the unprotected left main coronary after stenosis in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol,2004,97:73-76.
  • 3Erglis A, Narbute I, Kumsars I,et al. A randomized comparison of paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,50 : 491-497.
  • 4罗建平,刘惠亮,刘英马,东星,荆丽敏.使用5F共用型造影导管经桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影[J].武警医学,2004,15(10):738-740. 被引量:3
  • 5Park SJ, Kim YH, Lee BK, et al. Sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis comparison with bare metal stent implantation. J Am Coll Car diol,2005,45:351-356.
  • 6Das P, Meredith I. Role of intravascular ultrasound in unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 2007,5 : 81-89.
  • 7Valgimigli M, van Mieghem CAG, Ong ATL, et al. Short-and long-term clinical outcome after drug eluting stent implantation for the percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery disease. Circulation, 2005,111 : 1383-1389.
  • 8Khattab AA, Hamm CW, Senges J, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent treatment for unprotected versus protected left main coronary artery disease in widespread clinical routine:6-month and 3-year clinical follow-up results from the prospective multicentre German Cypher Registry. Heart, 2007, 93: 1251- 1255

二级参考文献5

  • 1李凯丽,林卡莉,唐兰茂,罗焕敏,徐能全.避免桡动脉插管后并发栓塞的探讨[J].赣南医学院学报,1998,18(2):106-109. 被引量:4
  • 2Louvard Y, Pezzano M, Scheers L et al . Coronary angiography by a radial artery approach :feasibility, learning curve.One operator's experience. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 1998,91(2) :209 - 215
  • 3Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography . Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1989,16(1) :3 - 7
  • 4Hildick- Smith DJ, Ludman PF, Lowe MD et al . Comparison of radial versus brachial approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography when the femoral approach is contraindicated. Am J Cardiol, 1998,81(6):770-772
  • 5姚民,乔树宾,王东方,杨跃进,秦学文,刘海波,吴永健,袁晋青,陈珏,尤士杰,戴军,吴元,姚康宝,陈纪林,高润霖.使用5F造影导管经桡动脉径路冠状动脉造影689例体会[J].中国循环杂志,2002,17(5):374-376. 被引量:84

共引文献2

同被引文献9

  • 1戴启明,马根山,冯毅,严金川,罗丹,沈成兴,丁建东,陈忠,章晓国.经桡动脉行冠状动脉慢性闭塞性病变介入治疗[J].江苏医药,2005,31(10):776-777. 被引量:2
  • 2Campeau I G. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary angiography[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn , 1989,16 (1) :3-7.
  • 3Kiemeneij F,Laarman G J. Pereutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1993,30(2) ;173-178.
  • 4Pierfrancesco A, Giuseppe G, Smiths R, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutancous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004,44(2) 349-356.
  • 5Kiemeneij F,Laarman G H,Odekerken D, etal. A randomized comparison of percutaneous translurninal coronary angioplasty by the radial, braehial and femoral approaches: the access study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997,29(6) : 1269-1275.
  • 6王雷.中国经挠动脉介入治疗注册调查研究[C].长城国际心脏病学会议,北京,2008.
  • 7Molinari G,Nicoletti I,De Benedictis M, et al. Safety and efficacy of the percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty in the elderly[J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2005,17(12) ; 651-654.
  • 8韩玮,刘惠亮,马春梅,罗建平,马东星,刘英.老年急性心肌梗死患者经桡动脉和股动脉介入治疗的对比分析[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2008,10(6):428-430. 被引量:8
  • 9罗建平,刘惠亮,马春梅,韩玮,杨胜利,马东星,荆丽敏,孟荣英.经桡动脉行复杂冠状动脉病变的介入治疗[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2008,10(7):492-494. 被引量:8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部