期刊文献+

司法审查之思想源流与制度预设——论美国制宪会议有关司法审查的辩论 被引量:2

Source of Idea and Institution Regulating about Judicial Review——On the Debates over Judicial Review of American Convention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法审查制度在美国的确立有其思想渊源与制度预设,其制宪会议有关司法审查的辩论即是明证。辩论之主题在于司法能否完全政治化、权力制衡是有限还是无限、制衡之权只能独立行使还是允许混合联盟。经过辩论,司法通过解释宪法行使违宪审查成为制宪者的政治共识和美国宪政政制中的制度预设。 The debates over judicial review of American Convention is at bottom a dispute Over that ( Ⅰ ) we should change judiciary branch into a political department, (Ⅱ ) the power of check is limited or unlimited, and ( Ⅲ ) the power of check must be controlled by one branch alone or by a mixed alliance consisting of two branches between Gerry-Group and Madison-Group. Convention adopted the opposition's position at last, and so the non-political characteristic of judiciary branch is kept, and its power of review of constitutionality to a certain extent embodies constitutionalism resulting from the original intent of framers.
作者 刘练军
出处 《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第2期58-64,共7页 Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家社科基金项目"违宪审查的原理与技术"(项目批准号:05BFX012)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 制宪会议 司法审查 权力制衡 制度预设 constitutional convention judicial review checks and balances constitutional regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[2]See,Marbury v.Madison,1 Cranch 137(1803).
  • 2[5]See,"To the public",in Life and Correspondence of James Iredell,ed.Griffith J.McRee,New York,PeterSmith,1949,2:145-149.又参见Bayard v.Singleton,1 N.C.(Mart.)48(1787) at 148.
  • 3[1]See Larry D.Kramer,The Supreme Court,2000 Term-Foreword:We the Court,115 Harv.L.Rev.4(2001).
  • 4[3]See,Laurence H.Tribe,Constitutional Choices,Harvard University Press (Cambridge Massachusetts,and London,England),1985,p.84.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部