高层管理团队(TMT)有效性的动态模型——人口特征研究与情景领导研究的结合被引量：4

Study on Dynamic Model for TMT Effectiveness

下载PDF

导出

摘要高层管理团队(Top management team,TMT)作为团队的一种特殊形式,因为其有效性对企业的生存发展起到至关重要的作用。所以近年来受到国内外学者的广泛关注。但是,在过去的文献研究中,我们不难发现,学者较多研究的是TMT在人口特征(年龄,教育背景等)的异质性同不同企业绩效指标之间的关系。但是不同学者的研究结果却往往相互矛盾。为了解释不同研究结果的差异,我们结合权变理论,提出了一个动态模型,来更好地分析TMT的有效性。 As a special form of team, top management team （TMT） is directly held responsible for the survival and development of the firm. So the effectiveness of TMT has been a focus of the scholars for decades. However, in the past literature, we find that most researches mainly examine the relationship between the heterogeneity of the TMT demographic characteristics and The demographic features of the performance of the firm. individuals of TMT such as age, tenure, educational background, field of expertise are treated as a key predictive indicator of the firm＇s performance. Despite the fact many researches find there exist a significant relationship between these two groups of variables, the results show great inconsistence. Therefore, by introducing the situational contingency theory, we propose a dynamic model to better analyze the effectiveness of TMT.

作者曹超英罗殿军

机构地区复旦大学管理学院

出处《上海管理科学》 2008年第2期42-46,共5页 Shanghai Management Science

关键词高层管理团队(TMT) 情景领导研究信息/利益不对称 Top Management Team （TMT） Situational Leadership Information/Interest Asymmetry

分类号 F276.6 [经济管理—企业管理] C924.24 [社会学—人口学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1[1]Amason,A.C.Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making[J].Academy of Management Journal,1996,39:123-148.
2[2]Edmondson,A.Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44:350-383.
3[3]Eisenhardt,K.M.& Bourgeois,L.J.Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments:Toward a midrange theory[J].Academy of Management Journal,1988,33:737-770.
4[4]Eisenhardt,K.M.& Schoonhoven,C.Organizational Growth:Linking Team Founding,Strategy,Environment,and Growth Among U.S.Semiconductor Ventures,1978-88[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(3):504-529.
5[5]Elangovan,A.Managerial Third-Party Dispute Resolution:A Prescriptive Model of Strategy Selection[J].Academy of Management Review,1995,20(4):800-830.
6[6]Elangovan,A.Managerial Intervention in Organizational Disputes:Testing a Prescriptive Model of Strategy Selection[J].International Journal of Conflict Management,1998,9 (4):301-335.
7[7]Hackman,J.R.Handbook of organizational behavior[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1987,315-342.
8[8]Hambrick,D.Fragmentation and other problems CEOs have with their top management teams[J].California Management Review,1995,37(3):110-127.
9[9]Hambrick,D.C.,Cho,T.S.,& Chen,M.J.The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41 (4):659-684.
10[10]Hambrick D.,D.Nadler,& M.Tushman.Navigating Change[M],Boston:HBS Press,1998,123-140.