期刊文献+

基于机组同调性的电力系统动态安全域改进解析法 被引量:3

An Improved Analytical Method for Determining Dynamic Security Region of Electrical Power Systems Based on Generator Coherency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大量仿真结果表明实用解析法求得的动态安全域(DSR)边界超平面系数的误差与机组同调性间有强相关性,据此提出基于机组同调性求解DSR的改进解析法。在实用解析法基础上将系统节点分为临界机组、剩余机组和负荷节点群,仅计算几个临界注入点,就可估算各组节点DSR边界超平面系数的修正量。IEEE10机39节点系统和118节点系统的仿真结果最大误差分别小于4%和0.7%,计算时间分别为拟合法的7.5%和1.3%,表明所提方法速度快、误差小且合理可行。 The dynamic security region (DSR) can provide plenty of security information and have good prospect in application. The simulation approach determines DSR by a lot of numerical simulation work, while the analytical method is rapid but the error of the results is relatively high. Lots of observation show that the errors of DSR boundary hyper-plane coefficients determined through analytic method are correlative highly to generator coherency. A new improved analytical method based on generator coherency is presented. Based on the results of the analytical method, the system nodes are divided into critical generator nodes, remnants generator nodes and loads. By adding only a few new critical points the deflection of each group is solved. The improved analytical method reduces the errors obviously and preserves the speediness feature. The errors can also be controllable by adjusting the increased number of the critical points. Test results on the New England 10-generator 39-bus test system show that when the time taken is 7.5% of the simulation approach, the maximum error of the test points is less than 4%, while simulation on the New England 118-bus test system shows that when the time taken is about 1.3% of the simulation approach, the maximum error of the test points is less than 0.7%.
出处 《电工技术学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期112-118,共7页 Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society
关键词 动态安全域 解析法 同调性 失稳模态 拟合法 Dynamic security region, analytical method, coherency, instability mode, simulation approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献24

  • 1余贻鑫,曾沅,冯飞.Differential topological characteristics of the DSR on injection space of electrical power system[J].Science China(Technological Sciences),2002,45(6):576-584. 被引量:8
  • 2冯飞,余贻鑫.电力系统功率注入空间的动态安全域[J].中国电机工程学报,1993,13(3):14-22. 被引量:29
  • 3余贻鑫,林济铿.电力系统动态安全域边界的实用解析表示[J].天津大学学报,1997,30(1):1-8. 被引量:8
  • 4余贻鑫 陈礼义(Yu Yixin Chen Liyi).电力系统的安全性与稳定性(Security and Stability of Power System)[M].北京:科学出版社(Beijing:Science Press),1 988..
  • 5[4]RibbensPavella M, Murthy P G, Horward J L. The Acceleration Approach to Practical Transient Stability Domain Estimation in Power System. In: Proceedings of 20th IEEE Conference of Decision Control. San Diego: 1981
  • 6[5]Xue Y, Custum Van, Pavella Ribberao. Real-time Analytic Sensitivity Method for Transient Security Assessment and Preventive Control. IEE Proceeding-C, 1988, 135(2): 107~117
  • 7[8]Wu F F, Tsai Y K. Identification of Group of ε-coherent Generators. IEEE Trans on Circuit Syst, 1983, 30(4): 234~241
  • 8[10]Kaufman L, Rousseeuw P J. Finding Croups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York: John Wiley &Sons, 1990
  • 9[11]Chiang H D, Wu F F, Varaiya P P. Foundation of Direct Method for Power System Transient Stability Analysis. IEEE Trans on Circuit Syst, 1987, 34(2): 160~173
  • 10Yu Yixin, Zeng Yuan, Feng Fei. Differential topological characteristics of the DSR on injection space of electrical power system[ J]. Science in China( Series E) ,2002,32(4) :503-509.

共引文献146

同被引文献48

  • 1韦化,阳育德,李啸骢.多预想故障暂态稳定约束最优潮流[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(10):91-96. 被引量:34
  • 2孙景强,房大中,锺德成.暂态稳定约束下的最优潮流[J].中国电机工程学报,2005,25(12):12-17. 被引量:38
  • 3薛禹胜.电力系统暂态稳定快速分析和控制的现状和发展[J].电力系统自动化,1995,19(1):6-13. 被引量:16
  • 4Deqiang Gan, Robert J Thomas, Ray D Zimmerman. Stability-constrained optimal power flow[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2002, 15(2): 535-540.
  • 5Quanyuan Jiang, Guangchao Geng. A reduced-space interior point method for stability constrained optimal power flow transient[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2010, 25(3): 1232-1240.
  • 6Luonan Chen, Yasuyuki Tada, Hiroshi Okamoto, et al. Optimal operation solutions of power systems with transient stability constraints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 2001, 48(3): 327-339.
  • 7Y Xia, K W Chan, M Liu. Direct nonlinear primal- dual interior point method for transient stability constrained optimal power flow[C]. IEE Proceedings of Generation Transmission and Distribution, 2005, 152(1), 11-16.
  • 8H R Cai, C Y Chung, K P Wong. Application of differential evolution algorithm for transient stability constrained optimal power flow[J]. IEEE Transac- tions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(2): 719-728.
  • 9Rafael Z~rate-Mifiano, Thierry Van Cutsem, Federico Milano, et al. Securing transient stability using time-domain simulations within an optimal power flow[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2010, 25(1): 243-253.
  • 10Quanyuan Jiang, Zhiguang Huang. An enhanced numerical discretization method for transient stability constrained optimal power flow[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2010, 25(4): 1790-1797.

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部