期刊文献+

输氯管线泄漏事故后果模拟 被引量:9

Simulation of accident consequences of liquefied chlorine pipeline leakage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 According to typical liquefied chlorine pipeline leakage,which is common in chemical production,the diffusion processes in different stages were simulated by using the Box model and Gauss puff model respectively.At the same time,the hazard area and degrees of influence were determined by using the intoxication accident consequences simulation techniques.The results showed that if 20 kg of liquefied chlorine leaked instantaneously,the heavy gas formed would change to neutral gas at 50 m to the leeward side.The hazard area could be divided into death zone,severe injury zone,slight injury zone,and breathe-in reaction zone.The death zone extended as far as 85 m to the leeward side,in which the death rate could reach up to 95%,and the duration of exposure should not exceed 10 min.The severe injury zone extended as far as 200 m to the leeward side,in which the death rate was 4%,and the duration of exposure should not exceed 60 min.The results of the simulation were in agreement with the consequences of such an accident caused practically.Therefore,it is reliable to simulate the accident results of unexpected leakage by choosing a suitable diffusion model and correlation parameters,and it is very important for supervising disaster reduction and salvage. According to typical liquefied chlorine pipeline leakage, which is common in chemical production, the diffusion processes in different stages were simulated by using the Box model and Gauss puff model respectively. At the same time, the hazard area and degrees of influence were determined by using the intoxication accident consequences simulation techniques. The results showed that if 20 kg of liquefied chlorine leaked instantaneously, the heavy gas formed would change to neutral gas at 50 m to the leeward side. The hazard area could be divided into death zone, severe injury zone, slight injury zone, and breathe-in reaction zone. The death zone extended as far as 85 m to the leeward side, in which the death rate could reach up to 950%, and the duration of exposure should not exceed 10 min. The severe injury zone extended as far as 200 m to the leeward side, in which the death rate was 4%, and the duration of exposure should not exceed 60 min. The results of the simulation were in agreement with the consequences of such an accident caused practically. Therefore, it is reliable to simulate the accident results of unexpected leakage by choosing a suitable diffusion model and correlation parameters, and it is very important for supervising disaster reduction and salvage.
出处 《化工学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期1333-1337,共5页 CIESC Journal
关键词 液氯 泄漏 模拟 重气云扩散 高斯烟团扩散 liquefied chlorine leakage simulation heavy-gas diffusion Gauss puff diffusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1沈艳涛,于建国.有毒有害气体泄漏的CFD数值模拟(Ⅰ)模型建立与校验[J].化工学报,2007,58(3):745-749. 被引量:27
  • 2Britter R E, McQuaid J. Workbook on the Dispersion of Dense Gas. UK:H.S.E. , 1987
  • 3Kari J Eidsvik. A model for heavy gas dispersion in the atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 1980, 14 :769-777
  • 4Hankin R K S, Britter R E. The shallow water approximation in dense gas dispersion over complex terrain//Stably Stratified Flows: Flow and Dispersion over Topography. Oxford= Oxford University Press, 1994: 223-245
  • 5England W G. Atmospheric dispersion of liquefied natural gas vapor cloud using SIGMET, a three dimensional time dependent hydrodynamic computer model//Crow C I, Grosshandler W L. Proceeding of the Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1978:4-20
  • 6Venkata G, Ashok K. An evaluation of four box models for instantaneous dense gas releases. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1990 (25): 237-255
  • 7YuDeming(宇德明).Quantitative Risk Evaluation of Flammable and Explosive Toxic Hazard During the Storage and Transportation (易燃、易爆、有毒危险品储运过程定量风险评价).Beijing:China Railway Press,2000:49-62
  • 8Mohan M, Panwar T S, Singh M P. Development of dense gas dispersion model for emergency preparedness. Atmospheric Environment, 1995, 29 (16): 2076-2087
  • 9Blackmore D R, Herman M N, Woodward J L. Heavy gas dispersion models. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1982, 6:107-128
  • 10WangYuanhui(汪元辉).Safety System Engineering(安全系统工程).Tianjin:Tianjin University Press,1999:233-266

二级参考文献21

  • 1张维凡,张希贤.重要有毒物质泄漏扩散模型研究[J].化工劳动保护(安全技术与管理分册),1996(3):1-19. 被引量:55
  • 2S.R.Hanna and P.J.Drivas. Guidelines for use of vapor cloud dispersion models(Second Edition). New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety, AIChE, 1996
  • 3P.Philippe and Gareth. Methods for assessing and reducing injury from chemical accidents. Joth Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1989
  • 4美陆军野战教范.化学武器与生物武器的使用(FM3-10).北京:战士出版社,1977
  • 5Ohba R,Kouchi A,Hara T,et al.Validation of heavy and light gas dispersion models for the safety analysis of LNG tank.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2004,17:325-337
  • 6Chan S T,Ermak D L,Morris L K.FEM3 model simulations of selected Thorney Island Phase I Trails.J.Hazardous Materials,1987,16:267-292
  • 7Pereira J C F,Chen X Q.Numerical calculations of unsteady heavy gas dispersion.Journal of Hazardous Material,1996,46:253-272
  • 8Wei Lijun(魏利军).Numerical simulation of heavy gas dispersion[D].Beijing:Beijing University of Chemical Technology,2000
  • 9Xu Guoqing(徐国庆).Studies on the discharging dispersion of flammable and toxic gases[D].Dalian:Dalian University of Technology,1998
  • 10Meng Zhipeng(孟志鹏).Numerical simulation of the dispersion of the dangerous gases around obstacles[D].Dalian:Dalian University of Technology,2003

共引文献83

同被引文献131

引证文献9

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部