期刊文献+

产前超声估测胎重多参数新回归方程及准确性比较 被引量:7

A New Formula for Estimation of Fetal Weight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:创建新的适合于中国人的多参数回归公式用于胎重估测。方法:750例孕妇,在分娩前3d以内超声检查,记录胎儿双顶径(BPD)、头围(HC)、腹围(HC)和股骨长(FL),出生后记录新生儿体重。其中600例用于公式创建,采用非线性回归设计公式,另150例用于公式的验证。结果:Log10EFW=1.0163+0.0023(HC)+0.0603(AC)+0.2571(FL)+0.0011(BPD)(AC)-0.0074(AC)(FL)(R=0.846)。在验证组,新公式与其他常用公式相比,平均绝对误差及平均绝对百分误差均为最低,准确性较高。结论:新公式更适宜于评估中国胎儿体重。 Objective: To develop a new formula to estimate fetal weight for Chinese populations. Methods: As the formula finding group, a total of 750 fetuses within 3 d of delivery were considered. Twoimensional ultrasound measurements of the fetal biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were performed and recorded by experienced ultrasound physicians. Then, nonlinear regression analysis was utilized to develop the new formula with BPD, HC, AC, and FL as independent parameters. As the formula evaluation group, another 150 fetuses' weight were estimated by the new formula and compared with other 6 well-established equations. Results: Log10EFW=1.016 3+0.0023(HC)+0.060 3(AC)+0.2571(FL)+0.001 1 (BPD)(AC)-0.0074(AC)(FL) (R=0.846) was the new formula. When tested it in the evaluation group, the new formula gave satisfactory estimation accuracy. The mean absolute error and the mean absolute percentage error were the lowest. Compared with other formula, the proposed formula yielded the best fit between the estimated fetal weight and the actual birth weight. Conclusion:The new formula is based on typical Chinese Han women, the error was lower and more suitable than those developed formulae for Western populations.
出处 《生殖与避孕》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期245-248,共4页 Reproduction and Contraception
基金 上海市卫生局科研课题资助项目(No.2006-21192)
关键词 胎儿体重 体重估测 超声 比较 fetal weight estimated fetal weight ultrasound compare
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Banerjee K, Mittal S, Kumar S. Clinical vs. ultrasound evaluation of fetal weight. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2004, 86 (1):41-3.
  • 2Landon MB, Mintz MC, Gabbe SG. Sonographic evaluation of fetal abdominal growth predictor of the large for (gestational age) infant in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. AM J Obstet Gynecol, 1989, 160(1): 115-21.
  • 3Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JM. Diagnostic ultrasound. St Louis: Mosby Inc, 2007: 1495-8.
  • 4Shepard M J, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, et al. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1982, 142(1):47-54.
  • 5Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements-a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1985, 151(3):333-7.
  • 6Hsieh FJ, Chang FM, Huang HC, et al. Computer-assisted analysis for prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound-comparison of biparietal diameter(BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length(FL). Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi, 1987, 86(9):957-64.
  • 7Combs CA, Jaekle RK, Rosenn B, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 82(3):365-70.
  • 8Johnsen SL, Wilsgaard T, Rasmussen S, et al. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur. Eur J Obstet Gyneeol Reprod Biol, 2006, 127(2): 172-85.
  • 9Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 25 (1): 80-9.
  • 10沈巧珍,潘琢如,蔡秋艳.胎儿小脑横径预测出生体重的相关性分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,1994,29(5):279-279. 被引量:7

二级参考文献3

  • 1关步云,中华医学杂志,1992年,72卷,65页
  • 2Oven P,Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1996年,103卷,60页
  • 3Vintzileos A M,Obstet Gynecol,1985年,66卷,477页

共引文献16

同被引文献54

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部