期刊文献+

均衡、非均衡及“错误”的现实意义:市场过程的视角 被引量:1

Equilibrium,Disequilibrium and the Practical Significance of "Error":From the Perspectives of Market Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从市场过程角度来看,均衡是市场过程中行动主体相互发现的倾向。在真实时间和全然无知的现实世界里,企业家发现必然是非均衡过程。在这一过程中,价格的非均衡信息作用极其重要,因为只有非均衡价格提供的利润机会才能激发企业家发现新知识。一旦抛弃新古典经济学的完全知识假设,企业家的发现过程必然具有"错误"、"失败"、"无效率"等特征。如果不借助经济主体"错误"和不断纠正"错误",企业家就不能在争胜竞争过程中发现利润机会,无法解决无效率问题。 From the market-process perspective, equilibrium means the tendency of mutual discovery among actors in the market process. In the real world with genuine time and sheer ignorance, the entrepreneurial discovery will inevitably be a disequilibrating process. In this very process, the disequilibrium informational role of price is significant, because only the profit opportunities arising from disequilibrium price can stimulate entrepreneurs to discover new knowledge. Once we abandon the perfect knowledge assumption of neo-classical economics, it will be safely concluded that the entrepreneurial discovery must be a process with characteristics of "errors", "failure" and "inefficiency". Without actors ' constantly error-making and error-correcting, it is impossible for the entrepreneurs to discover profit opportunities and solve the inefficiency problem in the competitive process.
作者 王廷惠
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期127-136,共10页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 广东省哲学社会科学2006年度课题(06004) 2006年度暨南大学人文社会科学引进人才项目的部分研究成果
关键词 均衡 非均衡 “错误” 市场过程 无知 equilibrium disequilibrium "error" market process ignorance
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献22

  • 1Casson, M., The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory, Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982.
  • 2Colander, D., 1996, Beyond Microfoundations: Post Walrasian Macroeconomics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ed.,2000, Complexity and the History of Economic Thought: Selected Papers from the History of Economics Society Conference, London & New York: Routledge.
  • 3Davidson, P., 1981,“Post Keynesian Economics: Solving the Crises in Economic Theory”, The Public Interest, Special Issue, 123-38.
  • 4Dosi, G., and Marengo, L., 1994,“Some Elements of an Evolutionary Theory of Organizational Competences”, in Englander R. W. ed.,Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • 5Dow, S. C., 1997,“Mainstream Economic Methodology”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(1):73-93.
  • 6Hodgson, G. M., 1993, Economics and Evolution, Polity Press.
  • 7Jaffe, W., 1976,“Menger, Jevons and Walras De-homogenized”, Economic lnquiry, 14(4):511-524.
  • 8Harper, D. A., 1998,“Institutional Conditions for Entrepreneurship”, in Boettke, P. J. and Ikeda, S. eds.,1998.Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume 5, Connecticut: JAI Press, Inc, 241-275.
  • 9Hayek, F. A., 1988, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, Bartley Ⅲ, W. W. ed., Vol. 1 of The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Kirzner, I. M.,1973, Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1979, Perception,Opportunity and Profit, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1982, ed., Method, Process, and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises, Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books. 1985, Discovery and the Capitalism Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2000, The Driving Force of the Market: Essays in Austrian Economics, London & New York: Routledge.

共引文献128

同被引文献22

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部