期刊文献+

Is there correlation between pancreatic enzyme and radiological severity in acute pancreatitis? 被引量:5

Is there correlation between pancreatic enzyme and radiological severity in acute pancreatitis?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To investigate the correlation between the changes of pancreatic enzyme, the biochemical markers and the clinical results according to the Balthazar computer tomography (CT) grade. METHODS: Between July 2004 and July 2005, we reviewed the charts of 119 patients who were admitted to our hospital with acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (69.7%) were male, and the mean age of the patients was 57 ± 15.7 years. The biliary pancreatitis patients had an older mean age. Forty-nine patients (41.1%) had biliary pancreatitis and forty-six (38.6%) had alcoholic pancreatitis. Group 3 patients had a longer duration of pain (2.51 ± 1.16 vs 3.17 ± 1.30 vs 6.56 ± 6.13, P < 0.001), a longer period of fasting (7.49 ± 4.65 vs 10.65 ± 5.54 vs 21.88 ± 13.81, P < 0.001) and a longer hospital stay (9.17 ± 5.34 vs 14.63 ± 8.65 vs 24.47 ± 15.52, P < 0.001) than the other groups. On the univariate analysis, the factors that affected the radiological grade were the leukocyte count at admission (P = 0.048), the hemoglobin (P = 0.016) and total bilirubin concentrations (P = 0.023), serum lipase (P = 0.009), the APACH Ⅱ scores at admission (P = 0.017), the APACH Ⅱ scores after 24 h (P = 0.031), the C-reactive protein (CRP) titer (P = 0.0001) and the follow up CRP titer (P = 0.003). But the CRP level (P = 0.001) and follow up CRP titer (P = 0.004) were only correlated with the radiological grade on multivariate analysis. According to the ROC curve, when we set the CRP cut off value at 83 mg/L, the likelihoodratio for a positive test was 3.84 and the likelihood ratio for a negative test was 0.26 in group 3. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study suggests that the CRP with the radiological severity may be used to estimate the severity of acute pancreatitis. AIM: To investigate the correlation between the changes of pancreatic enzyme, the biochemical markers and the clinical results according to the Balthazar computer tomography (CT) grade. METHODS: Between July 2004 and July 2005, we reviewed the charts of 119 patients who were admitted to our hospital with acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (69.7%) were male, and the mean age of the patients was 57 ± 15.7 years. The biliary pancreatitis patients had an older mean age. Forty-nine patients (41.1%) had biliary pancreatitis and forty-six (38.6%) had alcoholic pancreatitis. Group 3 patients had a longer duration of pain (2.51 ± 1.16 vs 3.17 ± 1.30 vs 6.56 ± 6.13, P 〈 0.001), a longer period of fasting (7.49 ± 4.65 vs 10.65 ± 5.54 vs 21.88 ± 13.81, P 〈 0.001) and a longer hospital stay (9.17 ± 5.34 vs 14.63 ± 8.65 vs 24.47 ± 15.52, P 〈 0.001) than the other groups. On the univariate analysis, the factors that affected the radiological grade were the leukocyte count at admission (P = 0.048), the hemoglobin (P = 0.016) and total bilirubin concentrations (P = 0.023), serum lipase (P = 0.009), the APACH Ⅱ scores at admission (P = 0.017), the APACH Ⅱ scores after 24 h (P = 0.031), the C-reactive protein (CRP) titer (P = 0.0001) and the follow up CRP titer (P = 0.003). But the CRP level (P = 0.001) and follow up CRP titer (P = 0.004) were only correlated with the radiological grade on multivariate analysis. According to the ROC curve, when we set the CRP cut off value at 83 mg/L, the likelihoodratio for a positive test was 3.84 and the likelihood ratio for a negative test was 0.26 in group 3. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study suggests that the CRP with the radiological severity may be used to estimate the severity of acute pancreatitis.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2008年第15期2401-2405,共5页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Acute pancreatitis Computed tomography C-reactive protein 急性胰腺炎 计算机断层摄影术 C反应蛋白 治疗方法
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1[1]Yousaf M,McCallion K,Diamond T.Management of severe acute pancreatitis.Br J Surg 2003;90:407-420
  • 2[2]Ranson JH,Rifkind KM,Roses DF,Fink SD,Eng K,Spencer FC.Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;139:69-81
  • 3[3]Larvin M,McMahon MJ.APACHE Ⅱ score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis.Lancet 1989;2:201-205
  • 4[4]Balthazar EJ,Robinson DL,Megibow.Acute pancreatitis:value of CT in establishing prognosis.Radiology 1990;174:331-336
  • 5[5]Simchuk EJ,Traverso LW,Nukui Y,Kozarek RA.Computed tomography severity index is a predictor of outcomes for severe pancreatitis.Am J Surg 2000;179:352-355
  • 6[6]Casas JD,Diaz R,Valderas G,Mariscal A,Cuadras P.Prognostic value of CT in the early assessment of patients with acute pancreatitis.Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:569-574
  • 7[7]Imrie CW,Benjamin IS,Ferguson JC,McKay AJ,Mackenzie I,O'Neill J.A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis.Br J Surg 1978;65:337-341
  • 8[8]Robert JH,Frossard JL,Mermillod B.Early prediction of acute pancreatitis:prospective study comparing computed Tomography scans,Ranson,Glasgow,APACHE Ⅱ scores,and various serum markers.World J Surg 2002;26:612-619
  • 9[9]Chatzicostas C,Roussomoustakaki M,Vardas E,Romanos J,Kouroumalis EA.Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE Ⅱ scoring systems in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome.J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;36:253-260
  • 10[10]Wilson C,Heath DI,Imrie CW.Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis:a comparative study of APACHE Ⅱ,clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems.Br J Surg 1990;77:1260-1264

共引文献70

同被引文献21

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部