期刊文献+

双切口微创稳定系统治疗复杂股骨远端骨折疗效评价 被引量:15

TREATMENT EVALUATION OF DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURE BY LESS INVASIVE STABILIZATION SYSTEM VIA TWO INCISIONS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析采用微创稳定系统(less invasive stabilization system,LISS)治疗复杂股骨远端骨折患者临床资料,评价其治疗效果。方法2004年3月-2005年11月,收治47例(49侧)股骨髁间、髁上骨折患者。男34例,女13例;年龄19~56岁,平均39.7岁。左侧21例,右侧28例。车祸伤31例,坠落伤8例,暴力打击伤6例,其他伤2例。髁间骨折14侧,髁上骨折21侧,两者合并骨折14侧。根据AO分型:33-A1型6侧,33-A2型8侧,33-A3型10侧,33-C1型7侧,33-C2型3侧,33-C3型15侧。闭合骨折32侧,开放骨折17侧。受伤至入院时间30min~6d。术中先复位固定关节面,利用双切口插入LISS钢板,透视满意后拧入锁定螺钉。结果患者手术时间为48~248min,平均126min。术中出血量为60~1200mL,平均180mL。术后45侧伤口Ⅰ期愈合,余4侧切口感染,对症治疗后愈合。47例患者均获随访12~23个月,平均18.6个月。4侧术中存在前后成角畸形,将LISS取出二次固定后纠正,术后无前后成角畸形。5侧内外翻角度为2~5°,2侧外旋畸形,1例患肢较健侧短缩2cm,均未作特殊处理。无下肢内旋患者,无钢板及螺钉断裂、松动等内植物失败情况发生。43侧骨折于术后3~8个月达临床愈合,平均5.6个月;余6侧经二次自体髂骨植骨后骨折愈合。膝关节Iowa评分:优22例,良19例,中6例,差2例,疗效评价优良率达83.6%。结论采用双切口LISS治疗复杂股骨远端骨折具有一定的优越性。 Objective To evaluate the clinical results of less invasive stabilization system (LISS) for femur supercondylar and intercondylar fractures. Methods From March 2004 to November 2005, 47 patients with 49 intercondylar and supercondylar fractures were treated. Of all the patients, there were 34 males and 13 females with an average of 39.7 years (range 19-56 years). The locations were left side in 21 cases and right side in 28 cases. Fracture was caused by traffic accident in 31 cases, falling in 8 cases, violence in 6 cases and others in 2 cases. Forty-nine fractures included 14 intercondylar fractures, 21 supercondylar fractures and 14 intercondylar and supercondylar fractures; 32 dosed fractures and 17 open fractures. According to the AO typing, there were 6 type 33-A1, 8 type 33-A2, 10 type 33-A3, 7 type 33-C1, 3 type 33-C2 and 15 type 33-C3. The disease course was 30 minutes to 6 days. Articular surface reduction was first performed, then the LISS plate was inserted via two incisions and locking screws were used later. Results The average operation time was 126 minutes (range 48-248 minutes). The blood loss was 180 mL(range 60-1 200 mL). The average follow-up time was 18.6 months (range 12-23 months). There were 4 patients with AP angular deformity and 5 patients with lateral angular deformity (range 2-5°). External rotation deformity was presented in 2 patients. There were no plate breakage, screw loosen and fixation failure. Average bone union time was 5.6 months (range 3-8 months) without infection case. Six cases were treated with iliac bone transplantation for delayed union. Conclusion LISS is one kind of effective treatment to femoral intercondylar and supercondylar fractures.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期520-523,共4页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 股骨骨折 微创内固定系统 疗效评价 Femur fracture Less invasive stabilization system Evaluation of clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Khalafi A, Curtiss S, Hazelwood S, et al. The effect of plate rotation on the stiffness of femoral LISS: a mechanical study. J Orthop Trauma,2006, 20(8): 542-546.
  • 2Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Zardiackas LD, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system and the 95-degree angled blade plate for the internal fixation of distal femur Fractures in human cadaveric bones with high bone mineral density. J Trauma, 2006, 60(4): 836-840.
  • 3Schutz M, Schafer M, Bail H, et al. New osteosynthesis techniques for the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Zentralbl Chir, 2005, 130(4): 307-313.
  • 4Schutz M, Muller M, Regazzoni P, et al. Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal femoral (AO33) fractures: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2005, 125(2): 102-108.
  • 5Kregor PI, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, et al. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasivc stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2004, 18(8): 509-520.
  • 6Markmiller M, Konrad G, Sudkamp N. Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (426): 252-257.
  • 7纪斌平.膝关节功能评估的历史与现状[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(4):244-248. 被引量:111
  • 8荣国威.骨折治疗的AO原则.北京:华夏出版社,2003:25-26.
  • 9Ricci AR, Yue JJ, Taffet R, et al. Less Invasive Stabilization System for treatment of distal femur fractures. Am J Orthop, 2004, 33(5): 250-255.
  • 10Mast JW, lakob R, Ganz R. Planning and Reduction Technique in Fracture. J Orthop Trauma, 1997, 12: 1-3.

二级参考文献96

  • 1罗从风,陈云丰,高洪,杨发民,眭述平,曾炳芳.改良双钢板法治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(6):326-329. 被引量:299
  • 2汤欣,黄辽江,吕德成,孙康,齐志明,李洪敬,曲巍.微创经皮钢板内固定治疗胫骨远段骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(9):572-574. 被引量:76
  • 3刘璠,茹江英,顾永强,严勋,施红光,王友华,曹毅,赵剑,陈向东,朱鸣镝,祝勇,王洪,曹涌.微创内固定系统治疗复杂性膝关节周围骨折的近期疗效[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(11):1015-1020. 被引量:50
  • 4纪斌平,马景崑,马棣庭,高钢.膝关节骨性关节炎的分型和关节镜视下治疗[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1997,4(2):98-100. 被引量:20
  • 5Schatzker J. Fractures of the distal femur revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, (347): 43-56.
  • 6Siliski JM, Mahring M, Hofer HP. Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur: treatment by internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1989, 71: 95-104.
  • 7Bolhofner BR. Indirect reduction and composite fixation of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995, (315):75-83.
  • 8Ries MD, Meinhard BP. Medial external fixation with lateral plate internal fixation in metaphyseal tibia fractures: a report of eight cases associated with severe soft-tissue injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1990, (256): 215-223.
  • 9Weiner LS, Kelley M, Yang E, et al. The use of combination internal fixation and hybrid external fixation in severe proximal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 1995, 9: 244-250.
  • 10Hutson JJ Jr, Zych GA. Infections in periarticular fractures of the lower extremity treated with tensioned wire hybrid fixators. J Orthop Trauma, 1998, 12: 214-218.

共引文献328

同被引文献110

引证文献15

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部