摘要
[目的]了解梧州市餐饮业、学校食堂和食品生产加工企业的风险度、信誉度现状及影响因素,制定卫生监督频次和重点。[方法]分层抽样方法抽取辖区内的191个单位,按国家有关规定实施食品卫生量化分级管理评定。[结果]信誉度和风险度分级情况为:C级最多为113家,占59.16%;其次是B级56家,占29.32%;D级有19家,占9.95%;最少的是A级3家,占1.57%;学校在卫生等级、卫生许可量化得分和经常性卫生监督量化得分上均高于其他类型单位。目前存在的主要问题有:单位负责人重视不够、卫生设施和食品储存条件差、建筑物布局安排不合理,还有卫生制度不健全及得不到落实。[结论]实施食品卫生监督量化分级管理对提高食品行业的卫生水平具有成效,应该继续推行这项制度。
[Objective] To master the risk and credit degree of food hygiene situation of restaurants, and scholastic dining rooms and food preduction and processing enterprises and its influencing factors, define the frequency and focal items of supervision. [Methods] 191 workplaces including restaurants, scholastic dining rooms and food production and processing en- terprises were selected by using stratified random sampling. According to state regulations of food hygiene to grade them. [Results] There were 113 in grade C, accounting for 59.16%; followed by the B 56, accounting for 29.32%; grade D 19, accounting for 9.95% 1 grade A 3, it was the least, accounting for 1.57%. The quantitative scores of hygiene degree, hygiene permit and regular health supervision in scholastic canteens were higher than others. We also found many problems, such as lacking attention officials paid, poor conditions on sanitation facilities and food storage, unreasonable layout and arrangement of building, and unsound hygiene regulations and not implemented. [Corlclusion] The quantitative grade administration of food hwiene system is an effective measure to raise the food hygiene level and it shotdd continue to carry out the system.
出处
《现代预防医学》
CAS
北大核心
2008年第9期1728-1730,共3页
Modern Preventive Medicine
关键词
食品卫生
分级管理
分析
Food hygiene
Grade administration
Analysis