期刊文献+

考试焦虑对与考试有关的词的颜色命名的影响 被引量:3

The Effects of Test-Anxious on the Color Naming of the Words related to Tests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:考察考试焦虑对高中生对与考试有关的词颜色命名的影响。方法:采用中学生考试焦虑量表评定198名高中二年级学生,从高低分段各选30名学生分别为高考试焦虑被试和低考试焦虑被试。采用Stroop效应范式,让高考试焦虑被试和低考试焦虑被试对与考试有关和无关的词的颜色进行命名。结果:高考试焦虑被试对与考试有关的词的颜色命名产生了显著的干扰效应,反应时比对与考试无关的词的颜色命名长了56ms(556.0±58.2/500.0±46.5,t=2.56,P=0.016),低考试焦虑的被试对与考试有关的词的颜色命名产生了显著的促进效应,反应时比对与考试无关的词的颜色命名短了40ms(470.0±51.1/510.0±45.7,t=-6.76,P<0.001)。结论:考试焦虑对与考试有关的词颜色命名有重要影响。 Objective: The present study explored the effects of test-anxious on the color naming of the words which related to tests. Methods: Utilizing the research model of Stroop effect, the high test anxious individuals and low test anxious individuals were asked to name the colors of words which related to test and the colors of the words which not related to words. Results: Test-anxious had remarkable interference effect to the color naming of the words related tests made by the high test anxious individuals, compared to the color of the words which unrelated to test, the naming response time of the high anxious subjects were prolonged 56 ms to test-related words ( 556. 0 ± 58.2/500. 0 ± 46. 5, t =2. 56, P=0. 016), the naming response time of the low anxious subjects were promoted 40 ms, they had shorter reaction time to test-related words (470. 0 ±51.1/510. 0 ±45.7, t = -6.76, P 〈0. 001 ), which showed significant promotion effects. Conclusion: Test-anxious had important effects on the color naming of the words which related to test.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期344-347,352,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(05JZD00034) 广东省自然科学基金团队项目(06200524) 广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究项目(06JDXMXLX01)
关键词 考试焦虑 颜色命名 STROOP效应 实验室研究 test anxiety color naming Stroop effect laboratory stduy
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1张积家,和秀梅,陈曦.纳西象形文字识别中的形、音、义激活[J].心理学报,2007,39(5):807-818. 被引量:22
  • 2Mackay DG, Shafto M, Taylor JK, et al. Relations between emotion, memory, and attention : Evidence from taboo Stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks. Mem Cognit, 2004, 32(3): 474 - 488.
  • 3陈俊,刘海燕,张积家.Stroop效应研究的新进展——理论、范式及影响因素[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):415-418. 被引量:51
  • 4杨小冬,罗跃嘉.注意受情绪信息影响的实验范式[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):833-841. 被引量:31
  • 5Mathews A, MacLeod C. Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states. Behav Res Ther, 1985, 23:563 -569.
  • 6Mogg K, Mathews A, Weinman J. Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states: a replication. Behav Res Ther, 1989, 27:317 -323.
  • 7Mathews A, MacLeod C. Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognit Emot, 2002, 16(3): 331 - 354.
  • 8Mathews C, MacLeod A. Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: Accessibility of information or assignment of processing priorities? Behav Res Ther, 1991,29(6): 599-610.
  • 9Merikle PM, Joordens S, Stolz JA. Measuring the relative magnitude of Unconscious influences. Conscious Cognit, 1995, 4 (4) : 422 - 439.
  • 10Merikle PM, Joordens S. Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Conscious Cognit, 1997, 6:219-236.

二级参考文献77

共引文献122

同被引文献77

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部