期刊文献+

酿酒酵母无标记转化子两种筛选方法比较

Comparison of Two Selection Method of Saccharomyces cerevisia Transformants with No Marker
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于食品安全性的要求,在涉及食品工程菌株的基因工程改造中不能使用抗生素或抗药性标记,无标记遗传育种法是这一领域的有益尝试,但由于缺乏一种快捷的筛选方法,转化子的筛选成为该方法的瓶颈。通过对传统的羧肽酶Y活性验证和实验室独创的96孔板结合菌落PCR两种筛选方法进行了无抗生素标记的酿酒酵母转化子筛选并对这2种方法进行比较。结果表明,在酵母菌株尚处于杂合基因的状态下,羧肽酶Y活性验证无效;通过96孔板结合菌落PCR的筛选方法可以实现高通量筛选。 According to food safety requirements, antibiotic marker could not be used in gene-engineering of cells concerning food, and marker-free genetic breeding method is a meaningful try in this field. However, lack of a high-throughput selection method (the selection oftransformants) became an obstacle for this method. In this paper, two activity assay of carboxypeptidase Y and the selecting method of 96-well plate combined with colony PCR were used and compared in the selection of transformants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with no marker. The results showed that under the condition of being a heterozygote ofS. cerevisiae, transformants selection via assay of carboxypeptidase Y was invalid and high-throughput selection could be carded out via the method of 96-well plate combined with colony PCR which was developed in the lab.
出处 《酿酒科技》 北大核心 2008年第5期17-20,共4页 Liquor-Making Science & Technology
基金 广东省自然科学基金项目(批准号:7301731) 广东省科技计划项目(2007B011000007) 广东东莞科技发展项目 中国博士后基金(批准号:20070410854)资助
关键词 微生物 酿酒酵母 基因敲除 转化子 高通量筛选 PCR microbe Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene knockout transformants high-throughput selection PCR
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1Yoder J I, Goldsbrough A P.Transformation systems for generating marker-free transgenic plants. Bio/Technology, 1994,12:263-267.
  • 2Ebinuma H, Sugita K, Matsunaga E, Yamakado M. Selection of marker-free transgenicplants using the isopentenyl transferase gene.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1997, 94:2117-2121.
  • 3Ebinuma H, Sugita K, Matsunaga E, Endo S, Yamada K, Komamine A. Systems for theremoval of a selection marker and their combination with a positive marker. Plant CellRep, 2001, 20:383-392.
  • 4De B M, Debrouwer D. Two T-DNAs co-transformed into Brassica napus by a doubleAgrobacterium tumefaciens infection are mainly integrated at the same locus. Theor ApplGenet, 1991, 82:257-263.
  • 5Daley M, Knauf V C, Summerfelt K R, Turner J C. Co-transformation with oneAgrobacterium tumefaciens strain containing two binary plasmids as a method for producingmarker-free transgenic plants.Plant Cell Rep, 1998, 17:489-496.
  • 6Komari T, Hiei Y, Saito Y, Murai N, Kumashiro T. Vectors carrying two separateT-DNAs for co-transformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens andsegregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J, 1996, 10:165-174.
  • 7Xing A Q, Zhang Z Y, Sato S, Staswick P, Clemente T. The use of the two T-DNAbinary system to derive marker-free transgenic soybeans. Invitro Cell Dev-Pl, 2000,36:456-463.
  • 8Matthews P R, Wang M B, Waterhouse P M, Thornton S, Fieg S J, Gubler F, Jacobsen JV. Marker gene elimination from transgenic barley, using co-transformation with adjacent`twin T-DNAs' on a standard Agrobacterium transformation vector. Mol Breeding, 2001,7:195-202.
  • 9Lu H J, Zhou X R, Gong Z X, Upadhyaya N M.Generation of selectable marker-freetransgenic rice using double right-border (DRB) binary vectors. Aust J Plant Physiol,2001,28:241-248.
  • 10Sugita K, Matsunaga E, Kasahara T, Ebinuma H. Transgene stacking in plants in theabsence of sexual crossing. Mol Breeding, 2000, 6:529-536.

共引文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部