期刊文献+

科技伦理:在风险观念的语境中 被引量:6

Scientific and Technological Ethics:In Context of Risk Ideas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为科学技术的"双刃剑"说的放大和提升,风险观念语境下科技伦理观不仅从价值层面揭示了科学技术的社会后果的"异化",而且揭示出科学技术与社会发展的诸多现实矛盾。这些矛盾既反映出人与自然的矛盾,更映射出人与社会的矛盾。如何化解这些矛盾,既有赖于反思传统科技伦理观以及科学技术与社会发展的伦理关系,更有赖于建立新的科技伦理观。尽管风险观念呈现出以"批判性"见长的理论特征,但其"建设性"的维度同样是不容忽视的。具体地说,风险观念语境下的科技伦理观,试图把对现代社会的政治批判与后现代伦理诉求结合起来,倡导一种新型的面向未来的全球性发展责任伦理、"向社会开放"的科技伦理和科技责任伦理。这对于化解科技风险危机富于启发意义。但这种科技伦理观的后现代主义消极立场,决定了其内在的局限性。只有推动科学技术与社会的协调发展,才可能切实解决科技风险危机问题。 With the science and technology as a 'double-bladed sword', the view of scientific and technological ethics in the context of risk ideas not only reveals the 'dissimilation' of the social results of science and technology in the field of value, but also reveals the various real contradictions in the development of science and technology and the society. These contradictions reflect both the controversy between man and the nature and the controversy between man and the society. The solution to these contradictions relies on the rethinking of the traditional ethnical view of science and technology and the ethnic relation between science and technology and the social development, and more on the establishment of new scientific and technological ethics view. Though the risk idea is characteristic of 'criticism' in theory, its 'constructive' dimension should not be neglected. To be specific, the view of the scientific and technological ethics tries to combine the political critique towards the modern society with the appeal of the post-modern ethics, initiates a new responsibility ethics for future-oriented universal development, the scientific and technological ethics towards 'social opening-up' and responsibility ethics. This is of enlightening significance for the solution of scientific and technological risk crisis. However, this post-modernist negative standpoint of scientific and technological ethics determines its internal limitations. According to the author, only by the promotion of the harmonious development of the science and technology together with the social development can this risk crisis be solved.
作者 崔伟奇
出处 《江海学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期5-10,共6页 Jianghai Academic Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1联合国教科文组织.《从信息社会到知识社会(2005年世界知识报告)》,第123、142、124页.
  • 2[德]贝克.《风险社会》,译林出版社,2004年版,第22页.
  • 3[德]贝克.《世界风险社会》,吴英姿等译,南京大学出版社.2004年版.
  • 4甘绍平.忧那思等人的新伦理究竟新在哪里?[J].哲学研究,2000(12):51-59. 被引量:35
  • 5[美]舍格斯特尔.《超越科学大战》,中国人民大学出版社2006年版,第162页.
  • 6[美]贾撒诺夫等.《科学技术论手册》,北京理工大学出版社2004年版,第404页.
  • 7[英]哈耶克 杨玉生等译.《自由宪章》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1998年版.第49-50页.
  • 8[美]费舍,拉维扎.《责任与控制-一种道德责任理论》,华夏出版社2002年版,第48页.
  • 9曹天予,胡新和.科学与历史之间的现代与后现代图景[J].哲学译丛,2001(1):51-57. 被引量:9
  • 10[英]鲍曼.《后现代伦理学》,江苏人民出版社2003年版,第243页.

共引文献61

同被引文献59

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部