期刊文献+

氟-18-氟代脱氧葡萄糖PET/CT不同时相延迟显像的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of the Different Phase Delayed Scan on ^(18)F-FDG PET/CT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较研究氟-18-氟代脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)PET/CT不同时相延迟显像对良恶性肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值,确定延迟显像的最佳时间选择。方法:回顾分析80例明确诊断且同时进行18F-FDGPET/CT三时相显像的患者共148个病灶。第1次显像时间为药物注射后64min;第2次(早期延迟显像)时间为110min;第3次(晚期延迟显像)时间为233min。分析每个病灶的最大标准摄取值(SUV),并根据公式滞留指数(RI1)=(SUV2-SUV1)/SUV1×100%;RI2=(SUV3-SUV1)/SUV1×100%进行计算。通过特征工作曲线(ROC)比较分析两次延迟显像的诊断效率。结果:80例患者共148个病灶。109个为恶性病灶,39个为良性病灶。恶性病灶的RI1和RI2分别为(14.8±13.1)%和(10.8±20.5)%;良性病灶的RI1和RI2分别为(11.3±28.2)%和(9.3±42.4)%。RI1的曲线下面积为0.627±0.050(P=0.013),RI2的曲线下面积为0.57±0.06(P<0.05)。早期延迟显像的诊断效率明显高于晚期延迟显像。结论:在应用18F-FDGPET/CT延迟显像进行良恶性鉴别诊断时,采取早期延迟显像可以获得较高的诊断效率。 Objective:To explore the most proper time for delayed scan through the comparison of the early and late delayed scan. Methods: Eighty cases suspected malignancy obtained three phase (64 min, 110 min, 233 min after FDG injection) PET/ CT scan, 109/148 lesions were malignancy, 39/148 lesions were benign, which were proven by pathology, clinical, laboratory and radiological examination. The maximum SUV value in three phase were recorded; Retention index of each lesion in two delayed phase were calculated according to the following formula: RI, and RI2 in both malignant and benign group were analyzed through correlation analysis. The diagnostic value of two delayed image were compared through ROC curve. Results: RI1 ,RI2 in malignancy were 14.8±13.1 %, 10.8 ±20.5%; RI,, RI2 in benign lesions were 11.3 ±28.2 %, 9.3 ±42.4 %. Through analysis of ROC curve, the area under ROC curve for RI1 was 0. 627±0. 050(P = 0. 0130). The area under ROC curve for RI2 was 0.57±0. 06(P〈0. 05). The diagnostic value of early delayed image is higher than late delayed image. Conclusion.. Early delayed scan is recommended in clinical practice.
出处 《中国临床医学》 北大核心 2008年第2期264-266,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
基金 上海市科委重点基金资助项目(04JC14044) 上海市百人计划三期资助项目(97BR012)
关键词 氟-18-氟代脱氧葡萄糖PET/CT 延迟显像 肿瘤 ^18F-FDG PET/CT Delayed scare Tumor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Gambhir SS, Czernin J, Schwimmer J, et al. A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature[J]. J Nucl Med, 2001,42(5 Suppl) :1S- 93S.
  • 2Cook GJ, Fogclman I, Maisey MN. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18 - fluoro 2 - deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation[J]. Semin Nucl Med, 1999,26:308-314.
  • 3Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, et al. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differenliating malignant from inflam matory processes[J]. J Nucl Med 2001,42:1412- 1417.
  • 4Yamada S, Kubota K, Kubota R, et al. High accumulation of fluorine- 18- fluorodeoxyglucose in turpentine- induced in flammatory tissue[J]. J Nucl Med, 1995,36:1301- 1306.
  • 5Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, et al. Dual time point F - 18 - FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules[J]. J Nucl Med, 2002,43:871 - 875.
  • 6赵军,林祥通,管一晖,左传涛,华逢春.双时相PET显像在肺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的应用[J].中华核医学杂志,2003,23(1):8-10. 被引量:63
  • 7Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Nakamoto Y, et al. Dual phase 18F fluoro - 2 - deoxy - D - glucose positron emission tomography as a prognostic parameter in patients wlth pancreatic cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med, 2005,32:389-397.
  • 8Boerner AR, Weckesser M, Herzog H, et al. Optimal scan time for fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer[J]. EurJ Nucl Med, 1999,26:226 - 230.

二级参考文献8

  • 1李家敏,孙启银,杨乃明,王明芳,黄术林,张登胜,赵军,孙爱君,李娜,黄少勇.^(18)F-FDG PET显像鉴别肺部单发肿块性质及肺癌分期的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,1997,17(2):77-79. 被引量:27
  • 2Markus Dietlein,Kerstin Weber,Afschin Gandjour,Detlef Moka,Peter Theissen,Karl W. Lauterbach,Harald Schicha. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of solitary pulmonary nodules: a decision analysis based on cost reimbursement in Germany[J] 2000,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(10):1441~1456
  • 3Roland Hustinx,Robin J. Smith,Francois Benard,David I. Rosenthal,Mitchell Machtay,Leonard A. Farber,Abass Alavi. Dual time point fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a potential method to differentiate malignancy from inflammation and normal tissue in the head and neck[J] 1999,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(10):1345~1348
  • 4Martin A. Lodge,Jonathan D. Lucas,Paul K. Marsden,Bernadette F. Cronin,Michael J. O’Doherty,Michael A. Smith. A PET study of 18FDG uptake in soft tissue masses[J] 1999,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(1):22~30
  • 5Yoshifumi Sugawara,Daniel K. Braun,Paul V. Kison,Joseph E. Russo,Kenneth R. Zasadny,Richard L. Wahl. Rapid detection of human infections with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: preliminary results[J] 1998,European Journal of Nuclear Medicine(9):1238~1243
  • 6尹大一,田嘉禾,陈英茂.影响SUV值可控因素的比较研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2000,8(3):207-209. 被引量:12
  • 7朱朝晖,周前,李方,李龙芸,崔瑞雪,李龙芸.^(18)F-FDG、^(99)Tc^m-MIBI和^(111)In-奥曲肽对肺癌诊断和治疗评价的比较[J].中华核医学杂志,2001,21(1):20-22. 被引量:5
  • 8管一晖,董竞成,何胜利,左传涛,赵军,刘永昌,林祥通.FDG PET在非小细胞肺癌诊断中的应用研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2001,7(5):346-348. 被引量:4

共引文献62

同被引文献18

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部