期刊文献+

进口反倾销的救济效果评估标准研究 被引量:2

Research on the Evaluation Criterion of Import Antidumping Remedy Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对进口反倾销救济效果的评估标准进行研究,在明确评估原则、评估对象、评估指标的基础上,提出了以倾销行为对进口贸易及国内产业造成的负面影响程度作为救济效果评估标准的主要依据,着重分析了评估标准的主要影响因素,以及确定评估标准合理值域的方法。 principles, influence This paper researches on the evaluation criterion of import antidumping remedy effect, defines evaluation objects and indexes, treats factors of evaluation criterion, the negative effect caused by dumping as the and gives the methodology for determining the evaluation base, analyzes the key criterion value and range
作者 何海燕 常明
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期107-111,共5页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"反倾销政策与产业损害数据资料库系统规划研究"(70573011)部分成果
关键词 进口反倾销 救济效果 评估标准 import antidumping remedy effect evaluation criterion
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):71-84. 被引量:143
  • 2唐宇.反倾销保护引发的四种经济效应分析[J].湖南社会科学,2004(5):102-104. 被引量:16
  • 3Finger.J.,Michael,H.Keith,H.,Douglas,R.Nelson.The political economy of administered protection[J].American Economic Review,1982(72):452-66
  • 4Hartigan,Sreenivas,K.,Philip,R.Perry.The injury determination category and the value of relief from dumping[J].Review of Economies and Statistics,1989(71):183-186
  • 5Lichtenberg,Frank,Hong,Tan.An Industry Level Analysis of Import Relief Petitions Filed by U.S.Manufacturers[C].In Troubled Industries in the United States and Japan,ed.By Hong Tan and Haruo Shimada.NewYork:St.Martin's Press,1990
  • 6Harrison,Ann.The New Trade Protection:Price Effect of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Measures in the United State[R].World Bank Working Paper,1991
  • 7Thomas,J.Prasa.The Trade Effects of U.S.Antidumping Actions[R].NBER Working Paper,NO.5440,1996
  • 8Thomas,J.Prnsa.On the spread and impact of antidumping[R].NBER Working Paper,NO.7404,1999
  • 9Corinne,M.K.,Susan,Skeath.Evidence on the upstream and downstream impacts of antidumping cases[J].North AmeriCan Journal of Economics and Finance,2002(13):163-178
  • 10Brenton,P.Antidumping policies in the EU and trade diversion[J].European Journal of Political Economy,2001,17

二级参考文献39

同被引文献15

  • 1舒东.评析欧美在对华反倾销案件中的“一国一税”政策[J].中山大学学报论丛,2004,24(5):156-159. 被引量:5
  • 2钟根元,王方华,张周.基于行政复审与福利最大化的反倾销税率比较[J].系统工程学报,2004,19(6):658-660. 被引量:5
  • 3刘顺鸿.反倾销税有效性和合理性分析[J].商场现代化,2007(04S):22-23. 被引量:2
  • 4Won W. Koo, Ihn H. Uhm. Effects of dumping vs. anti-dumping measures: the US trade remedy laws applied to wheat imports from canada[J].J ournal of World Trade, 2007,41(6) :46-51.
  • 5Staiger R. W, Wolak F. A. Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States[M]. Brookings Papers on Economics Activity, Microeconomics,2006:60-82.
  • 6Krupp C. M. , Pollard P.S. Market response to antidumping laws: some evidence from the U. S. chemical industry[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1996,29 (1) : 200-218.
  • 7Bruce A. and Jee-Hyeong Park. Dynamic pricing in the presence of anti-dumping policy[C]. NBER Working Paper,2001.
  • 8EITHER Wilfred J. Dumping[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1982,90(3) :487-506.
  • 9DAVIES Stephen W, MCGUINNESS Anthony J. Dumping at less than marginal cost [J]. Journal of In temational Eco nomics, 1982, 12(1/2) : 169-182.
  • 10BRANDER J, KRUGMAN Paul. A "Reciprocal Dumping" model of international trade [J]. Journal of International Economics, 1983,15(3/4) :313-321.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部