期刊文献+

改良APACHEⅡ评分系统对急性脑血管疾病的病情评估价值 被引量:3

Application of Reformative APACHEⅡ Score in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨改良APACHEⅡ评分系统在急性脑血管疾病中的应用价值。方法:采用改良后APACHEⅡ评分系统对147例急性脑血管疾病进行评分,根据APACHEⅡ分值分层比较各组缓解率、住院率和病死率,并比较生存组和死亡组的APACHEⅡ评分。结果:根据改良APACHEⅡ评分分值进行分组后,随着分值逐渐升高,病死率也逐渐升高,死亡组评分均值显著高于生存组(P<0.05)。结论:改良APACHEⅡ评分系统用于急性脑血管疾病评估病情和预后,更加简便、快捷,适合急诊抢救需要。 Objective:To study application value of reformative acute physiologic and chronic health score (APACHE Ⅱ score) on patients with acute cerebrovascular disease. Methods: 147 patients were evaluated with reformative APACHE Ⅱ score and divided into 5 groups according to the scores. The recovery rate, admission rate and mobidity rate were compared between the survival group and the mobidity group. Results:An increased reformative APACHE Ⅱ score showed an increased mobidity rate. The reformative APACHE Ⅱ score in the mobidity group was higher than that in the survival group, with a significant difference (P 〈 O. 05 ). Conclusion: Reformative APACHE Ⅱ score can be used to evaluate pathogenetic conditions and prognosis of patients with acute cerebrovascular disease conviniently. It is more convenient, quicker and suitable for emergency eases.
出处 《临床误诊误治》 2008年第5期34-35,共2页 Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy
关键词 脑血管病 诊断 病情评估 APACHEⅡ评分系统 Cerebrovascular disease Diagnosis Prediction APACHE Ⅱ score
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1梁建业.危重病患者病情评定法——APACHE系统的研究进展[J].中国危重病急救医学,1996,8(1):52-56. 被引量:65
  • 2Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE Ⅱ: a severity of diseasa classification system[J]. Crit Care Med,1985,13(10):818
  • 3Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and analysis in radiological ROC studies[J]. Invest Radiol, 1989,24: 234- 245
  • 4Sirio CA, Tajimi K, Knaus WA, et al. An initial comparison of intensive care in Japan and the United States[J]. Crit Care Med,1992,20(9) : 1207 - 1215
  • 5Rowan KM, Kerr JH, Major E, et al, Intensive Care Society's APACHE Ⅱ study in Britain and Ireland Ⅱ: Outcome comparison of intensive care units after adjustment for care mix by the American APACHE Ⅱ method[J], BMJ, 1993,307(6910) :977-981
  • 6Oh TE, Hutchinson R, Short S,et al. Verification of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system in a HongKong intensive care unit[J]. Crit Care Med, 1993,21 (5):698
  • 71,Castslla X,Antigsa,BionJ,et al .A comparison of severity of illne ss scoring systems for intensive c are unitpatients:results of multi center,multinational study,The Eur opean/North Americanseverity grou p.Crit Care Med,1995,23(8):1327-1335
  • 8中华神经科学会.中华神经外科学会[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-379.
  • 93,Knaus WA,Zimmerman JE,Wagner DP ,et al.APACHE Ⅱ:a severity of dise aseclassification system.Crit Car e Med,1985,13(10):818
  • 104,Wilson C,Health DI,Imrie CW.Pred iction of outcome in acute pancrea titis:acomparative study of APACH E Ⅱ:clinical assessment and multip le factor scoringsystems.Br J Sur g,1990,77(11):1260-1264

共引文献343

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部