期刊文献+

加氢站氢气运输方案比选 被引量:42

Comparison of Hydrogen Transportation Methods for Hydrogen Refueling Station
下载PDF
导出
摘要 首先结合文献定性介绍了现有氢气运输方式,然后对氢气通过长管拖车、槽车及管道运输的运输成本、能源消耗及安全性进行深入研究.运输成本通过建立加氢站氢气运输成本模型进行分析,结果表明上海大规模氢气运输的长管拖车运输成本为2.3元.kg-1,液氢运输成本为0.4元.kg-1,管道运输成本为6元.kg-1.氢气液化能耗占自身低热值30%以上,约为压缩能耗的3倍左右,但气态氢气运输能耗高于液氢运输能耗.运输中尽管存在如高压、液氢蒸发以及氢脆等安全风险,但都可通过设计、规范等措施避免.根据分析结果,对于上海近期千辆级规模燃料电池汽车的发展计划,长管拖车输送氢气是最佳方案. This paper first presents a review of the existing hydrogen delivery methods. Then a study is made of the delivery cost, energy consumption and the safety of hydrogen transportation by tube trailer, tank and pipe. A hydrogen transportation cost model is established to calculate the large-scale hydrogen transportation cost in Shanghai. The results show gaseous hydrogen (GH2) transportation cost by tube trailer is 2.3 RMB. kg^-1, liquid hydrogen (LH2) by tank is 0.4 RMB. kg^-1, and GH2 by pipe is 6 RMB. kg^-1. Regarding to the energy consumption, hydrogen liquefaction consumes more than 30 % of its low heat value (LHV) ; about 3 times of hydrogen compression. There may exitst some risks such as. high-pressure, LH2 boil-off and permeability during the delivery, which can be avoided cylinder design, regulation and so on. Based on the analysis result, hydrogen delivered by tube trailer is the best option for a plan to establish a scale of about a thousand fuel cell vehicles in Shanghai.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期615-619,共5页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家"863"高技术研究发展计划资助项目(2003AA501340) 上海市科委燃料电池汽车科技攻关项目(05dz12025)
关键词 加氢站 氢气运输 成本 能耗 安全 hydrogen refueling station hydrogen transportation cost energy consumption safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Amos W A. Costs of storing and transporting[R]. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1998.
  • 2Simbeck D R,Chang E. Hydrogen supply: cost estimate for hydrogen pathways: seoping analysis [ R ]. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2002.
  • 3Glass R, Zalesky R. Report of the production and delivery subgroup [ R]. California: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2004.
  • 4Unnasch S, Kassoy E, Weinert J, et al. California Hydrogen Fueling Station Guideline[R]. California: TIAX LLC, 2003.
  • 5Short W, Packey D J, Holt T. A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies[ R]. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1995.
  • 6Sherif S A, Barbir F, Veziroglu T N. Towards a hydrogen economy [J]. The Electrleity Journal. 2005, (18) : 62.
  • 7Mercuri R,Bauen A,Hart D. Options for refueling hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Italy [J]. Journal of Power Source,2002, (106) : 353.
  • 8Syed M T,Sherif S A,Veziroblu T N,et al. An economic analysis of three hydrogen liquefaction systems [ J ]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1998,23 (7) : 565.
  • 9Bossel U, Eliasson B. The future of the hydrogen economy: bright or bleak? [ R/OL]. [ 2003 -03 - 26 ]. http://www. fuelandfiber. com/Athena/hydrogen-economy. pdf.
  • 10王洪海.关于氢气气瓶安全性的讨论[J].压力容器,2003,20(9):29-31. 被引量:10

二级参考文献4

  • 1化学工业部化工机械研究院.腐蚀与防护手册-腐蚀理论、试验及检测[M].化学工业出版社,..
  • 2.ISO11120-1999.水容积为150 L-3000 L可重复使用的无缝钢瓶的设计、制造和试验[S].,..
  • 3.49CFR,§178.37.美国联邦法规标准[S].,..
  • 4秋长鋆.高强度钢在常温高压氢气中的氢脆[J].中国锅炉压力容器安全,1999,15(6):15-19. 被引量:11

共引文献9

同被引文献534

引证文献42

二级引证文献362

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部