“否定者不承担举证责任”探析

Discussion on ＂The one who denies bears no onus probandi＂

最高人民法院2002年4月1日施行的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定）封举证责任的分配原则起到了重要的补充作用，但对诉讼中的否认、抗辩仍然没有做出规定，造成司法实践中的混乱。本文从民事诉讼中“主张者”的证明责任、“主张者”的举证责任分配概念出发，探析“否定者不承担举证责任”在司法实践中的适用。

Regulations promulgated by the Supreme Court of ER.C on Evidence for Civil Cases, which was put in force on April 1, 2002, has played an important supplementary role to the distribution principle of onus probandi, but it has regulated the denial and demur in the suit, resulting in confusion of judicial practice. Beginning with the concepts of ＂the assertors＇ burden of proof＂ and ＂onus probandi distribution of assertors＂, this article tries to discuss the application of ＂The person who denies bears no onus probandi＂ in the judicial practice.