期刊文献+

鼻咽鳞癌CNE1、CNE2细胞系IMRT模式离体照射生物效应研究 被引量:2

In Vitro Study of the Radiobiological Effects of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Lines CNE1 and CNE2 in IMRT Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察适形调强放射治疗(IMRT)模式单次剂量输出时间延长对鼻咽鳞癌CNE1、CNE2细胞放射生物效应的影响,以便为临床制定个体化IMRT计划提供一些理论依据。方法分别急速照射指数生长期的CNE1细胞、CNE2细胞9个剂量点,采用克隆分析法计算细胞存活分数,运用单靶多击和线性二次方程数学(LQ)模型拟合曲线,求出2种细胞放射生物学参数。将指数生长期的CNE-1细胞、CNE-2细胞分成3个组:①EBRT组;②IMRT模式15min照射组;③IMRT模式30min照射组(单次剂量输出时间延长至15min和30min)。每组照射总剂量为6Gy,1次/天,2Gy/次,连续照射3天,采用克隆分析法计算细胞的存活分数。结果急速照射1次后的各点细胞存活率以单靶多击模型拟合曲线,得出CNE1细胞D0值为0.88Gy,Dq值为0.47Gy,N值为3.5,CNE2细胞D0值0.60Gy,Dq值为0.36Gy,N值为4.0;以LQ模型拟合曲线,得出CNE1细胞α值为0.16Gy-1,β值为0.089Gy-2,α/β值为1.8Gy,CNE2细胞α值为0.97Gy-1,β值为0.086Gy-2,α/β值为11.3Gy。CNE1细胞EBRT组细胞存活率为7.21%,IMRT模式15min照射组为8.85%,IMRT模式30min照射组为9.92%,IMRT模式组随着单次剂量时间延长到15min和30min,细胞存活率较EBRT组明显增加,t检验有显著差异(P<0.05)。CNE2细胞EBRT组为0.190%,IMRT模式15min照射组为0.204%,IMRT模式30min照射组细胞存活率为0.207%,t检验无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论鼻咽高分化鳞癌CNE1细胞具有较低的α/β值及较大的D0、Dq值,相对于鼻咽低分化鳞癌CNE2细胞具有较强的亚致死性修复(SLDR)能力。SLDR能力在单次剂量延长的放疗中对细胞存活起重要作用。IMRT模式单次剂量输出时间延长将使CNE1细胞存活率增加明显,而CNE2细胞增加不明显。 Objective To investigate the impact of prolonged fraction delivery time by modeling intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on radiobiological effects of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines CNE1 and CNE2 ,to provide radiobiological basis for individual IMRT optimization for this disease. Methods Cell lines CNE1 and CNE2 prepared with exponential growth phase were irradiated acutely at 9 dose levels. The cell survival was calculated by classical colony forming assay, then was fitted by using standard linear-quadratic (LQ) model and single hit multi target model to get the values of radiobiological parameters. Each of the two cell lines was then irradiated on three models :①EBRT model ( the ceils were irradiated continuly by 6 MV X-ray) ;②15 min IMRT model;③30min IMRT model. (the same dose as the EBRT in 15 minutes and 30 minutes with a pulse manner). The total doses of each group were 6 Gy with a fraction dose of 2 Gy in 3days. The cell survival of three models was calculated by classical colony forming assay. Results The values of Dq,D0 and N of CNE1 were 1.54 Gy ,0.82Gy ,. 5 and the values of CNE2 were 0.60 Gy,0.36 Gy,4.0 respectively by using single hit multi target model. The values of α,β,α/β of CNE1 were 0.16 Gy^-1 ,0. 089 Gy^-2, 1.8Gy and the values of α,β α/β of CNE2 were 0.97 Gy^-1 ,0.086 Gy^-2, 11.3 Gy, respectively by using standard LQ model. The CNE1 cell survival percentage in EBRT model, 15min IMRT model and 30min IMRT model was 7.21,8.85,9.92 respectively. The survival percentage of CNE1 irradiated by modeling IMRT with the fraction delivery time prolonged to 15 min and 30 min was significantly higher than that of conventional EBRT with paired t-test( P 〈0.05 ). The CNE2 cell survival percentage by EBRT model, 15 min IMRT model and 30min IMRT model was 0. 190,0.204,0.207 respectively, and had no significant differences between different models ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Well differentiated nasopharyngeal SqCa cell CNE1 with a lower α/β and higher DO ,Dq has a relatively large capacity for sub-lethal damage repair( SLDR ) than poorly differentiated nasopharyngeal SqCa cell CNE 2 . The capability of SLDR was the predominant factor determining the cell kill - ing decrease , the prolonged fraction delivery time modeling IMRT significantly increased the cell survival in CNE1 but not in CNE2.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2008年第3期248-251,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 适形调强放疗 生物效应 细胞存活曲线 亚致死性损伤修复 Intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) Radiobiological effects Cell survival curve Sub-lethal damage repair(SLDR)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Ahmed RS, Kim RY, Duan J, et al. IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph node in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004,60 ( 2 ) : 505.
  • 2Elkind MM, Sutton HG. X-ray damage and recovery in mammalian cells in culture [J]. Nature, 1959, 184 ( 4695 ) : 1293.
  • 3Harald Paganetti PHD. Changes in tumor cell response due to prolonged dose delivery times in fractionated radiation therapy[J]. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys,2005,63 (3) :892.
  • 4张春,潘建基,张瑜,柏朋刚,张秀春,王根桃.鼻咽癌适形调强放疗对腮腺功能影响的前瞻性研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2007,22(4):380-383. 被引量:8
  • 5Elkind MM. Sublethal X-Ray Damage and Its Repair in Mammalian Cells [M]. In: G. Silini ( ed. ), Radiation Res. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 1967: 558.
  • 6Boothman DA, Bouvard I, Hughes EN. Identification and characterization of x-ray induced proteins in human cells [J]. Cancer Res,1989,49( 11 ) :2871.
  • 7Carney DN, Mitchell JB, Kinsella TJ. In vitro radiation and chemotherapeutic sensitivity of established cell lines in human small cell lung cancer and large cell morphology variants[J]. Cancer Res, 1983,43 (6) :2806.
  • 8Kelland LR, Steel GG. Dose-rate effects in the radiation response of four human tumour xenografts [J]. Radiother Oncol, 1986,7 (3) : 259.
  • 9Wang JZ, Li XA, D'Souza WD, et al. Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: A note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,57 (2) :543.
  • 10Harald Paganetti PHD. Changes in tumor cell response due to prolonged dose delivery times in fractionated radiation therapy [J]. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys, 2005,63 (3) :892.

二级参考文献14

  • 1潘建基,郑步宏,张瑜,陈传本,李金莲,张秀春.鼻咽癌适形放疗中摆位误差的测定[J].癌症,2006,25(1):115-118. 被引量:14
  • 2林端瑜,唐明灯,潘建基,张春,金星.核素显像法观察放射治疗对鼻咽癌患者腮腺功能的影响[J].福建医药杂志,2006,28(3):9-11. 被引量:3
  • 3Tsujii H.Quantitative dose response analysis of salivary function following radiotherapy using sequential RI-siallography[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Bio Phys,1985,11(9):1603.
  • 4Matthew B.Parliament,Rufus A,et al.Presrvation of oral health-related quality of life and salivary flow rates after inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2004,58:663.
  • 5Avraham Eisbruch,Robert L.Foote,et al.Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer:emphasis on the selectio and delineatio of the targets[J].Seminars in Radiatio Oncology,2002,12(3):238.
  • 6Xia P,Fu K,Wong GW,et al.Comparison of treatment plans involving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,48:329.
  • 7高汝祯 邓敬兰 吴织芬.^99mTcTc腮腺功能测定及其临床应用.中华核医学杂志,1987,7(4):226-226.
  • 8Rode M,Smid L,Budihna M,et al:The effect of pilocarpine on salivary secretion during and after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,45(2):373.
  • 9Rieger J,Seikaky H,Jha N,et al.Submandibular gland transfer for prevention of xerostomia after radiation therapy:swallowing outcomes[J].Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2005,131(2):140.
  • 10Eisbruch A,Ten Haken R,Kim HM,et al.Dose,volume and function relationships in parotid glands following conformal and intensity modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,45(3):557.

共引文献7

同被引文献25

  • 1张矛,金海国,卜明伟,孙宝胜,孙术全,苏清秀,李玉平.脑胶质瘤术后VMAT与IMRT放疗技术间比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2011,28(6):2959-2963. 被引量:30
  • 2张书旭,徐海荣,林生趣,李文华.鼻咽癌调强放疗和常规放疗受照剂量对比分析[J].第一军医大学学报,2004,24(8):937-939. 被引量:15
  • 3张春,潘建基,张瑜,柏朋刚,张秀春,王根桃.鼻咽癌适形调强放疗对腮腺功能影响的前瞻性研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2007,22(4):380-383. 被引量:8
  • 4Benedict SH, Lin PS, Zwicker RD, et al. The biological effectiveness of intermittent irradiation as a function of overall treatment time: development of correction factors for linac-based stereotaetic radiotherapy [J]. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys, 1997, 37(4): 765-9.
  • 5Wang JZ, Li XA, D'Souza WD, et al. Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: a note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 57(2): 543-52.
  • 6Fang FM, Chien CY, Tsai WL, et al. Quality of life and survival outcome for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy-a longitudinal study [J]. hat J Padiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 72(2): 356-64.
  • 7Kampinga HH, Hiemstra YS, Konings AW, et al. Correlation between slowly repairable double-strand breaks and thermal radiosensitization in the human HeLa S3 cell line'[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 1997, 72: 293-301.
  • 8Siegel R,Naishadham D,Jemal A. Cancer statistics,2013 [J]. CA : a cancer journal for clinicians, 2013,63 ( 1 ) : 11-30.
  • 9Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy:IMRT in a single gantry arc [J], Medical Physics, 2008,35 (1) : 310.
  • 10Vieillot S,Azria D, Lemanski C, et al. Plan comparison of volumetric -modulated arc therapy (RapidArc)andConventional intensity -modulated radiation therapy (iMRT)in anal canal cancer [J]. Radiat Oncol,2010,5 (8): 1984-,3990.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部