1Samei E, Flynn MJ. An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems[J]. Med Phys, 2002,29(4):447-459.
2Samei E, Flynn JM. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems[J]. Med Phys, 2003,30(4):608-622.
3Woodard PK, Slone RM, Gierada DS, et al. Chest radiography: depietion of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography[J]. Radiology, 1997,203(1):197-201.
8Chotas HG, Dobbins JT 3rd, Ravin CE. Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors : a review of the basics. Radiology, 1999, 210: 595-599.
9Chotas HG, Floyd CE, Ravin CE.Technical evalution of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector. Radiology, 1995,195:264-270.
10Woodard PK, Slone RM, Gierada DS, et al. Chest radiography :depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography. Radiology, 1997,203:197-201.
8Fang RtRowlands JA. X-ray imaging with amouphous selenium:elective quantum efficiency of photoconductive receptors for digitalmammography[j]. Med Phys, 1995,22: 153-160.
