期刊文献+

农地管制中的财产权保障——从外部效益分享看农地激励性管制 被引量:29

Protection of the Estates of Farmland in the Process of Control and Management——On Incentive Control of Farmland from the Angle of Share of External Benefits
下载PDF
导出
摘要 耕地抛荒现象暴露出我国现行农地管制制度中隐含的产权问题:农地农用所产生的环境生态、粮食安全等外部效益被简单地视为一种"公共利益",并理所当然地归属于社会公众所有,而政府更以此"公共利益"为由理所当然地对农户的土地使用权施以限制。此种财产权界定虽然保障了公众的需要,却忽视了农户的利益和感受;严重的利益分享不公,导致农地管制制度所应当具有的保障并促进农地外部效益供给的功能无法充分发挥,使得管制效率低下。因此,有必要在农地管制中引入激励相容的理念,在禁止规范之外建构一套合理可行的激励机制,透过法律创设农地外部效益财产权,并对此财产权及农地使用权给予明确的界定与保障,由政府代理社会大众进行必要的补偿或财产权交易,以真正达成农地保护的目的。 Farmland lying waste reveals a problem of estates arising out of the present control and management of land. The external benefits such as environmental ecology, security of grains, etc. resulting from exploitation of farmland are simply held as a “public interest” that by nature and right belongs to the public. The government even takes it for granted that the estates of farmland ought to be limited since they are public. Such a demarcation, though taking into account the public demand, ignores the interests and feelings of farmers and leads to unfair share of benefits. The result is that the protective and incentive function of the control and management institution cannot be fully performed and its efficiency is decreased. As such, it is urgent for us to introduce into farmland control the notion of incentive, ascertain the external benefit estate by law and explicitly define and protect the estates and use of farmland. The government should serve as an agent of the masses to provide necessary indemnity or engage in transactions of the estates so as to enhance the protection of farmland.
作者 杨惠 熊晖
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期70-79,共10页 Modern Law Science
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(A级)"改革发展成果分享法律机制研究"(05&zd029)子课题六"环境利益分享现状考察与法律对策研究"
关键词 农地管制 农地外部效益 财产权保障 激励性管制 farmland control and management external benefits out of farmland protection of estates incentive control and management
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1秦晖.中国转轨之路的前景[J].战略与管理,2003(1):1-20. 被引量:33
  • 2刘凤芹.弃耕还是复种-土地抛荒现象考察[EB/OL].(2004-02-24)[2008-01-20].http://www.xslx.corn/htm/jjlc/nyjj/2004-02-24-16169.htm.
  • 3李昌麒,应飞虎.论经济法的界限[C]//中国经济法制的反思与前瞻-2001全国经济法理论研讨会优秀论文集.北京:法律出版社,2001:20.
  • 4陈瑞主 吴骊瑛.市场机制下农地与农地外部效益财产权之界定与保障.经济社会法制论丛,2005,(35):294-295.
  • 5颜爱静,陈立夫,杨国柱.新国土计划体系下农业发展地区管理机制与配套法令之建置[R].台湾“行政院农业委员会”委托课题报告,2005:158-160.
  • 6钱克明.中国“绿箱政策”的支持结构与效率[J].农业经济问题,2003,24(1):41-45. 被引量:121
  • 7钱克明.2004年“一号文件”执行效果调查分析[J].农村经营管理,2005(5):4-6. 被引量:13
  • 8Laura S. Underkuffler. When Should Rights "Trump"? An Examination of Speech and Property [J].ME. L. REV,2000(52) :322.
  • 9Lawrence W. Libby. Farmland Protection Policy: An Economic Perspective[EB/OL]. ( 1997 - 01 - 18 ) [2008-01 -25 ]. http://aftresearch, org/research/resource/publications/wp/wp97 - 1. html.
  • 10叶俊荣.出卖环境权:从五轻设厂的十五亿回馈基金谈起[J].环境政策与法律.台北:月旦出版公司,1993:49

二级参考文献5

共引文献176

同被引文献513

引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部