摘要
目的检验心理健康量表2005年修订版(MHS V2005)的效度。方法抽取山东省六个有代表性的市共1183名被试作为普通人群样本,用MHS V2005、自尊量表、自我效能感量表以及症状自评量表施测;抽取精神障碍患者样本共100例,用MHS V2005施测。结果(1)验证性因素分析显示,MHS V2005的RMR和RMEA分别为0.049和0.077,GFI、AGFA〉0.9。(2)效标效度:量表的一、二阶因素及量表总分与自尊量表的相关系数为0.182~0.456,与自我效能感量表的相关系数为0.110~0.489,量表的一阶因子分与SCL-90各因子分的相关系数为0.111~0.690,量表的二阶因素和量表总分与SCL-90各因子分及总分的相关系数为0.215~0.760(P〈0.01)。(3)精神障碍组13个一阶因素、3个二阶因素和全量表分均显著高于普通人群组(P〈0.01)。结论MHS V2005的效度达到心理测量学要求。
Objective To test the validity of the Mental Health Scale revised version 2005 ( MHS V2005 ) as a tool for use in the general population. Methods The 1183 samples of general population completed a questionnaire regarding socio-demographics, MHS V2005, Self-esteem Scale (SES), General Self Efficacy Scale (GSES) and Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90). The samples of mental disorders were 100 patients with mental disorders that met CCMD-3 criteria, who completed the MHS V2005. Results ( 1 ) Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the RMEA of the model of Mental Health Scale was 0.11, the GFI, NFI, CFI were higher than 0.85 . (2) Criterion-related-validity:the correlation coefficient between the score of SES and the score of every first-order factor, second-order factor and the total score of the MHS were ranged from 0. 182 to 0.456, and those of GSES were ranged from 0.110 to 0.4897 ( P 〈 0.01 ) ( 3 ) Comparative study between the group of the general people and the group of psychiatric patients showed that all of the score in the group of psychiatric patients including the firstorder factors , second-order factors and the total score were significantly higher than those in the group of the general people( P〈0.01 ). Conclusion The validity of the MHS V2005 achieved the criterion of psychometric.
出处
《中国行为医学科学》
CSCD
2008年第5期473-474,共2页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science